And that's the issue with AGW. They want us to spend 20 Trillion, and cripple are already palsied and polio'ed economy, based on theories which don't stand up well to critical analysis.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2009/1/20 archytas <[email protected]> > >> >> Thus I think we should act as though >> mankind is screwing up big-time and get more control of global >> warming, even if the evidence eventually turns out to have been >> misinterpreted. > > > Fair enough, but only if the risk of ploughing on with such initiatives was > not so terrifying. The obscene amounts of cash the government spends on this > rubbish could be far better spend investigating zero gravity feeding for > cats, setting up state-funded whore houses, creating one-stop euthanasia > booths in post offices, and creating a 200ft solid gold statue of Glenys > Kinnock. > > Ian > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
