Ohhhh-bama. His cabinet is made up of DC insiders, big government stalwarts, and generals in the war on drugs.
Change we can believe in? Heh. Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss. On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:07 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have great sympathy for that view Ian. We even have a minor version > of what Chris put forward. It's called Warm Front or something like > it. Insulation and central heating grants ripped off by a company > doing transfer pricing as surely as any Russian oligarch steals gas by > the same mechanism. We do not do the circumspection first, let alone > incorporate it in action strategies. Hardly surprising we gave the > congestion plan the finger in Greater Manchester - we just don't trust > the politicians. They are reading out the Lord's Prayer at Obama's > inauguration - and I'm feeling he is a complete con already. I would > say "the economy" has crippled us already - in heart and mind. The > guy doing the one stop booths for post offices was working for > Prescott's idiot office via Lancaster University. I rather approve of > the Kinnock statue - at least we could nick that and melt it down! My > point is there is no real argument - just bluster. Sooner or later, > as we are forced to look up the skirts of Glenys' golden idol, they > will tell us this proves government strategy is working. When we ask > to see the actual strategy, they will just tell us to look harder up > the skirts and that we had better damn well smile too! > Governments are very bad. Maybe they survive because we can't even do > circumspect analysis ourselves? > > On 20 Jan, 14:24, "Chris Jenkins" <[email protected]> wrote: > > And that's the issue with AGW. They want us to spend 20 Trillion, and > > cripple are already palsied and polio'ed economy, based on theories which > > don't stand up well to critical analysis. > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > 2009/1/20 archytas <[email protected]> > > > > >> Thus I think we should act as though > > >> mankind is screwing up big-time and get more control of global > > >> warming, even if the evidence eventually turns out to have been > > >> misinterpreted. > > > > > Fair enough, but only if the risk of ploughing on with such initiatives > was > > > not so terrifying. The obscene amounts of cash the government spends on > this > > > rubbish could be far better spend investigating zero gravity feeding > for > > > cats, setting up state-funded whore houses, creating one-stop > euthanasia > > > booths in post offices, and creating a 200ft solid gold statue of > Glenys > > > Kinnock. > > > > > Ian > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
