It is cute, but unfortunatelt it is invalid. Here is a similar argument to illustrate how:
1) "Tiddles" is a cat. 2) Cats are mammals 3) Dogs are mammals 4) Therefore Dogs are "Tiddles". But some of the others are valid enough, they issue is whether they are sound. On Jan 18, 11:17 am, "Chris Jenkins" <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know, but I'm particularly happy about this one: > ARGUMENT FROM BLINDNESS (II) > (1) God is love. > (2) Love is blind. > (3) Stevie Wonder is blind. > (4) Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God. > (5) Therefore, God exists. > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Kierkecraig <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > 574 of those things? You gotta be kidding me? Who took the time to > > write out all that crap? > > > On Jan 16, 11:19 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > They brought it back!!! > > > >http://www.godlessgeeks.com:80/LINKS/GodProof.htm- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
