Ian!  How can you question the absolute brilliance of that
journalistic work?  Best I've seen in quite sometime.  j/k of course,
but I only wanted to show it because it shocked me that there were
brits who were arguing for gun rights.  I thought you guys were pretty
much all of one mind on the issue.  Guess I was wrong.

On Jan 31, 1:22 am, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote:
> Gun control laws designed to ensure that only decent "responsible"
> individuals can possess guns don't ever work. Michael Ryan's guns were all
> legally bought and licensed, and yet he murdered 16 people and injured 15 in
> the Hungerford massacre. He was also a member of a gun club. Apparently
> filling in forms and acting normal for 5 minutes whilst you buy a gun isn't
> too difficult, even for a very disturbed character intent on serious harm.
> Is there a better solution for these controls?
>
> Although I hate to question the journalistic integrity of that clip from
> RedneckTV, the idea that the rise in UK gun crime is because of the handgun
> ban is way wide of the mark. Overwhelmingly, the new gun crime we're seeing
> in the UK in gang-related (gang on gang); suggesting that we open up some
> shops where they can buy more guns for their little turf or race wars is an
> epic failure of logic. More guns isn't the answer to a gun problem, and the
> liberal American legislation, given their gun crime figures, should be seen
> as a serious warning to all countries, not something to copy. Remember, in
> the UK, gun crime in robberies (for example) continues to fall (Home
> Office). And UK gun crime only accounts for 1% of all violent crime (Home
> Office).
>
> Ian
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to