Can't help but snicker.
On Feb 5, 6:05 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> Gotcha-Tory!
>
> Ya! Fuel. Well I've heard similar Rep speak that Clinton years were a
> result of trickle down Reganomics. Credit where credit is due no
> doubt but I wouldn't think the quagmire of current economic woes are
> attributed to any other than Bush and Cheney policy. We can't rule
> out that Clinton actually was a good President. If we could go back in
> time and overrule the term limit law, keeping Clinton for another 8
> years the country would be doing well.
>
> On Feb 4, 9:53 pm, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > SD,
> > Didn't intend for my tone to come across as hostile. Just attempting
> > to fuel a discussion.
>
> > On Feb 4, 8:33 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Are you sure it's "pretty strong language"? I thought it was
> > > humorous.
>
> > >http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blbushmonkey1.htm
>
> > > Take a chill KC, it's not that serious!
>
> > > On Feb 4, 7:01 pm, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I don't know enough about the intricacies of economics to engage in
> > > > any meaningful discussion here. However, I don't think things are as
> > > > clear as it may seem. I've heard argument that it is true that when
> > > > democrats are in office the economy seems to be better than when
> > > > republicans are in office. I have also heard that the reason this may
> > > > be so is because we don't feel the effect of the republicans policies
> > > > until the republicans are out of office. Then the democrats are in
> > > > office, they reverse the republicans policies, and enjoy the perks
> > > > that came with those policies. Then its one mean cycle over again.
>
> > > > I really can't say one way or the other, I just wanted to point out
> > > > that I don't think its a black and white subject. So blaming a
> > > > "Chimpanzee President" may be pretty strong language for such an
> > > > unsettled problem.
>
> > > > On Feb 4, 5:37 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Wednesday, August 4, 1999
>
> > > > > For the first time in 25 years, the US Government plans to reduce the
> > > > > size of the national debt.
>
> > > > > The Republicans are proposing a $792bn tax cut, while President
> > > > > Clinton and the Democrats want to add funds to the social security
> > > > > retirement program and Medicare, which provides health care for older
> > > > > people.
>
> > > > > Such a course of action has long been advocated by Alan Greenspan, the
> > > > > influential chairman of the US central bank, the Federal Reserve. He
> > > > > argues that reducing government debt should take priority over tax
> > > > > cuts, as the move will free funds for private investment and lower
> > > > > government spending.
>
> > > > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/the_economy/411973.stm
>
> > > > > It's amazing how 8 years and a Chimpanzee President can turn things
> > > > > upside down.
>
> > > > >http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
