Chris, I didn't say my defense of Bush was easy. It makes it especially hard when he bent over, grabbed his ankles, and invited the democrats to do their business. The bailout was Bush trying to save face after being completely humiliated and destroyed by the MSM. But, nevertheless, I defend him. In fact I'm surprised that a man like Bush was even possible in today's pansy laden society. I think the Bush administration was the last vestige we will see of any attempt at strength by the American people. From here on out you can plan on us exhibiting nothing but weakness. I think we will pretty much reflect the likes of every downtrodden and defeated society in the West. From here on out will see the East rise.
On Feb 6, 12:28 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's where we differ on that, Craig. > We have 8 years of some fairly sizable errors in judgment, and crises of > administration. Now, we have a new president who's been in office two weeks. > You know I am more than willing and able to be critical as the need arises, > but on what basis would you continue that administration, as opposed to > trying out a new direction? The first bailout bill was the final act of > Grand Larceny against the American People perpetrated by Bush's > administration. I don't see how you wouldn't take umbrage with that. > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have no doubt I'm on my own. I defend him when no one else will. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
