Lying under oath. It's what he was disbarred for. Lawyers like to bend the truth in knots(definition of is is) but outright lying is a no no. It's also, incidentally, against the law when your under oath.
dj On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm curious, Don, what it is you think he deserved impeachment for? > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Republican majority, yes. Republican controlled, um, I think not. >> Semantics, perhaps, but the Dems did some damage and were a general >> nuisance with what passes for a filibuster these days. Repubs don't >> have enough to filibuster now. We actually have a Dem. controlled >> Congress. They are currently trying to run this country into the >> ground at full speed and succeeding. I'm on pins and needles waiting >> to see what moonbats get appointed as supreme court justices. >> Conservatives don't have the votes to block anything. >> >> Please don't mistake me for a fan of Bush. Clinton, despite being a >> lying hound dog, was the better president. I would not have admitted >> that in 2004, but I freely admit it now. He absolutely deserved the >> impeachment but even back then I was glad he wasn't removed from >> office. >> >> dj > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
