I'm confounded somewhat. Can you expound on this idea of said state?
On Apr 2, 12:51 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
> As to 'blinkers'....'tisn't the case. If worked upon...a specific
> state does arise. This has been known 'forever'. The length of said
> state is what differs from person to person...and changes over time.
> For the rare few, it is omnipresent.
>
> On Apr 2, 9:27 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The only time I am aware of is the present.
> > I know I can not change the past though I can examine it, but I can do that
> > only in the present
> > Through decisions of the present I an effect the future,, I think even
> > incorrect because can only effect the present.
> > Therefore there is only the existence of time is the present.
> > hmm I vote for eternity.
>
> > Allan
>
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I like Allen Ginsberg's take on it: "Smash a clock, cast your vote for
> > > Eternity".
>
> > > Ian
>
> > --
> > (
> > )
> > I_D Allan
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
