The 'rare few' have been omnipresent too Orn. I suspect your 'lead keys' is close to the mark on time though. The presence of both past and future in the present is often leaden rather than emancipatory.
On 3 Apr, 03:03, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm confounded somewhat. Can you expound on this idea of said state? > > On Apr 2, 12:51 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As to 'blinkers'....'tisn't the case. If worked upon...a specific > > state does arise. This has been known 'forever'. The length of said > > state is what differs from person to person...and changes over time. > > For the rare few, it is omnipresent. > > > On Apr 2, 9:27 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The only time I am aware of is the present. > > > I know I can not change the past though I can examine it, but I can do > > > that > > > only in the present > > > Through decisions of the present I an effect the future,, I think even > > > incorrect because can only effect the present. > > > Therefore there is only the existence of time is the present. > > > hmm I vote for eternity. > > > > Allan > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I like Allen Ginsberg's take on it: "Smash a clock, cast your vote for > > > > Eternity". > > > > > Ian > > > > -- > > > ( > > > ) > > > I_D Allan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
