Hah! I have finally created my 'time bubble' in the shed. It's turned out a bit big, so I'll have to deconstruct the shed to free it for 'flight'. The warp drive was easy - Hawking radiation was the problem, cooking anything in the bubble. This now powers a flue-less pot-bellied stove in which my compatriot can cook breakfast on a shovel. Your time and dimensions will crack in my first experiments as we nip off to now nearby galaxies to put bets on the Grand National (won by Mom's Donkey this year) before our light gets to their bookies. We will be travelling at the speed of instantaneous gravity, or rather the bubble will with our experience of time unaffected directly - hence we will be back more or less after the time taken to place the bets, but unable to claim winnings for a few eons. We will even have revenge on hedge betting derivative bwankers once our collateral is understood (as their's never was). Gliding over the Higgs' Field will; be much more scientific than your ominpresidential dimensionalities. Any ideas on what to use for brakes Slip?
On 7 Apr, 02:42, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > You are both welcome...and, no, I don't THINK it....:D > On Apr 6, 3:06 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes. Thanks. > > > On 6 Apr., 04:41, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Just when I thought I had more, time is up. Achtung! > > > > On Apr 5, 6:16 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Time's Up. lolhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CemHlCUOMK8 > > > > > On 4 Apr., 13:56, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > And you think that through these paths one can achieve omnipresence? > > > > > > On Apr 3, 11:33 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > "...Can you expound on this idea of said state?" - SD > > > > > > > No Slip...I'm not talking about an idea at all... > > > > > > If one practices/studies different paths...like meditation...for a > > > > > > while...changes do arise. > > > > > > > On Apr 2, 7:03 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm confounded somewhat. Can you expound on this idea of said > > > > > > > state? > > > > > > > > On Apr 2, 12:51 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > As to 'blinkers'....'tisn't the case. If worked upon...a > > > > > > > > specific > > > > > > > > state does arise. This has been known 'forever'. The length of > > > > > > > > said > > > > > > > > state is what differs from person to person...and changes over > > > > > > > > time. > > > > > > > > For the rare few, it is omnipresent. > > > > > > > > > On Apr 2, 9:27 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The only time I am aware of is the present. > > > > > > > > > I know I can not change the past though I can examine it, but > > > > > > > > > I can do that > > > > > > > > > only in the present > > > > > > > > > Through decisions of the present I an effect the future,, I > > > > > > > > > think even > > > > > > > > > incorrect because can only effect the present. > > > > > > > > > Therefore there is only the existence of time is the present. > > > > > > > > > hmm I vote for eternity. > > > > > > > > > > Allan > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ian Pollard > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I like Allen Ginsberg's take on it: "Smash a clock, cast > > > > > > > > > > your vote for > > > > > > > > > > Eternity". > > > > > > > > > > > Ian > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > ( > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > I_D Allan- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
