I had considered this Slip, but am a little concerned not many cultures would welcome us with open arms (or nostrils) as we bubble into their worlds. Shades of Ivor Windybottom ... and as Orn guesses this is about the level of it. Rather than pre-determined scepticism, I think we should consider humour amongst the seriousness of what may just be tosh or votaryism. I have long believed spiritual dimensionality is more 'real' than we care to admit, rather than non- existent. There is plenty of reason to speculate and to allow resonance with views one may reject after fair consideration - ice cold objectivism (an epistemological farce) is much more dangerous than flippancy or the raising of modes of faith with peaceful aims.
Our vile neighbours have moved, though we have just been woken by police looking for them. Three cheers from all I hope? You people have been much more help than I think you can know in helping us through this from the 'decent dimension'. A prayer of thanks is in Hilbert space ... Neil On 8 Apr, 04:29, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > Compressed cow fart methane of course, with a pressure release valve > for the blow back deceleration. > > On Apr 7, 8:01 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hah! I have finally created my 'time bubble' in the shed. It's > > turned out a bit big, so I'll have to deconstruct the shed to free it > > for 'flight'. The warp drive was easy - Hawking radiation was the > > problem, cooking anything in the bubble. This now powers a flue-less > > pot-bellied stove in which my compatriot can cook breakfast on a > > shovel. Your time and dimensions will crack in my first experiments > > as we nip off to now nearby galaxies to put bets on the Grand National > > (won by Mom's Donkey this year) before our light gets to their > > bookies. We will be travelling at the speed of instantaneous gravity, > > or rather the bubble will with our experience of time unaffected > > directly - hence we will be back more or less after the time taken to > > place the bets, but unable to claim winnings for a few eons. We will > > even have revenge on hedge betting derivative bwankers once our > > collateral is understood (as their's never was). Gliding over the > > Higgs' Field will; be much more scientific than your ominpresidential > > dimensionalities. Any ideas on what to use for brakes Slip? > > > On 7 Apr, 02:42, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > You are both welcome...and, no, I don't THINK it....:D > > > On Apr 6, 3:06 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Yes. Thanks. > > > > > On 6 Apr., 04:41, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Just when I thought I had more, time is up. Achtung! > > > > > > On Apr 5, 6:16 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Time's Up. lolhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CemHlCUOMK8 > > > > > > > On 4 Apr., 13:56, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > And you think that through these paths one can achieve > > > > > > > omnipresence? > > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 11:33 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > "...Can you expound on this idea of said state?" - SD > > > > > > > > > No Slip...I'm not talking about an idea at all... > > > > > > > > If one practices/studies different paths...like > > > > > > > > meditation...for a > > > > > > > > while...changes do arise. > > > > > > > > > On Apr 2, 7:03 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I'm confounded somewhat. Can you expound on this idea of said > > > > > > > > > state? > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 2, 12:51 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > As to 'blinkers'....'tisn't the case. If worked upon...a > > > > > > > > > > specific > > > > > > > > > > state does arise. This has been known 'forever'. The length > > > > > > > > > > of said > > > > > > > > > > state is what differs from person to person...and changes > > > > > > > > > > over time. > > > > > > > > > > For the rare few, it is omnipresent. > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 2, 9:27 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The only time I am aware of is the present. > > > > > > > > > > > I know I can not change the past though I can examine it, > > > > > > > > > > > but I can do that > > > > > > > > > > > only in the present > > > > > > > > > > > Through decisions of the present I an effect the future,, > > > > > > > > > > > I think even > > > > > > > > > > > incorrect because can only effect the present. > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore there is only the existence of time is the > > > > > > > > > > > present. > > > > > > > > > > > hmm I vote for eternity. > > > > > > > > > > > > Allan > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ian Pollard > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I like Allen Ginsberg's take on it: "Smash a clock, > > > > > > > > > > > > cast your vote for > > > > > > > > > > > > Eternity". > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ian > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > ( > > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > I_D Allan- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
