I am actually gorgeous- spectacular- sensational. Women hate me. I
don't seem to age like a crone. Or my lawyer married to his "General"
wife.Imagine the despair in referring to your wife as "The General"!

On May 16, 6:49�am, e_space <[email protected]> wrote:
> rigsy is cute...in text anyway ;-^)
>
> On May 16, 7:24�am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > 'I am a grandmother but...' �.... Hey the mention of Grandmother
> > evokes the Granny picture... not my fault...;-)
>
> > On May 16, 4:14�pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > You have a picture in your your mind of "grandma". I forgive you.
>
> > > On May 16, 5:51 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > thats wat i like about old people(no offence)...presuming you are old
> > > > since grandmas are old..that they have like a huge repository of
> > > > experience.. and from it wisdom...yuo have seen life.. to me life is
> > > > still a wonder ypu know.. and i wonder how will it pass... just too
> > > > eager.. impatient.. wat does it feel to have lived.. so much.. this is
> > > > not a crappy question.. it seriously fascinates me...
>
> > > > On May 16, 3:38 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > You do get to a point where you have heard or seen it all and seem not
> > > > > shocked or surprised- except you are.
>
> > > > > On May 16, 5:23 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > I guess we keep evolving with experience... that goes for matters in
> > > > > > decision making... maybe that is why the Judges of Law courts are 
> > > > > > old
> > > > > > people...
>
> > > > > > On May 16, 3:12 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > You will be a different person by 40, 60, 80...but hopefully not 
> > > > > > > stuck
> > > > > > > in some silly decision you made at 20 when your brain is not even
> > > > > > > evolved until age 25 in the matters of judgement and decision 
> > > > > > > making.
>
> > > > > > > On May 15, 10:09 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Yeah! you are right i guess... sometimes i get sick too ...and
> > > > > > > > everything seems meaninglesss.. but the curiosity of the future 
> > > > > > > > .. of
> > > > > > > > what will happen in my life keeps me going... but i am not even 
> > > > > > > > 20
> > > > > > > > yet... wonder wat'll keep me onwards around 40... do i sound 
> > > > > > > > depressed
> > > > > > > > or wat !!! ;-)
>
> > > > > > > > On May 15, 7:59 pm, e_space <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > maybe they just got sick of opium and booze sandwiches for 
> > > > > > > > > breakfast?
>
> > > > > > > > > to give you my opinion about your question 'is life really
> > > > > > > > > meaningless?"...the more one delves into their spiritual 
> > > > > > > > > existance,
> > > > > > > > > the less signifigance is placed on material things. if the 
> > > > > > > > > spirit
> > > > > > > > > becomes highly tuned in, passtimes such as eating and the
> > > > > > > > > consequential removal of waste (sorry), become more like a 
> > > > > > > > > chore than
> > > > > > > > > a pleasure and can seem quite mundane. even the act of 
> > > > > > > > > breathing,
> > > > > > > > > while vital, exemplifies our human reliability on such for 
> > > > > > > > > existance.
>
> > > > > > > > > under these conditions, the only thing that can substantially 
> > > > > > > > > relieve
> > > > > > > > > the weight of our humanity is a great soul mate to share ones 
> > > > > > > > > spirit
> > > > > > > > > with...i do not have such, and am therefore looking forward 
> > > > > > > > > to a
> > > > > > > > > bright future elsewhere, although not in a negative way, but 
> > > > > > > > > full of
> > > > > > > > > joy and anticipation. human life is finite, spiritual life 
> > > > > > > > > infinite
> > > > > > > > > and therefore human life as we know it holds less 
> > > > > > > > > signifigance...thats
> > > > > > > > > my opinion and im sticking to it! ;-^)
>
> > > > > > > > > On May 15, 8:17 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Arent we over with the purpose of life already...... i mean 
> > > > > > > > > > there have
> > > > > > > > > > been quite a number of discussions on it lately!!!shouldnt 
> > > > > > > > > > we put our
> > > > > > > > > > views under the corresponding topic rather than making a 
> > > > > > > > > > new topic by
> > > > > > > > > > the same name... and the purpose of life is to find a 
> > > > > > > > > > purpose and
> > > > > > > > > > stick to it..... hey why do you think all the great intense 
> > > > > > > > > > writers
> > > > > > > > > > committed suicide..like Hemingway and Virginia Woolf..coz 
> > > > > > > > > > they find
> > > > > > > > > > life meaningless... is that it... is life really 
> > > > > > > > > > meaningless...
>
> > > > > > > > > > On May 15, 3:33 pm, e_space <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > very well francis...but how about answering the question 
> > > > > > > > > > > instead of
> > > > > > > > > > > bashing those who havent pleased u with their answer? u 
> > > > > > > > > > > know, lead by
> > > > > > > > > > > example?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On May 15, 4:37 am, frantheman 
> > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > This thread is a good example of a general 
> > > > > > > > > > > > deterioration in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > quality of discussion and debate on the 'Eye recently. 
> > > > > > > > > > > > One-line
> > > > > > > > > > > > assertions, unsupported by any kind of logical 
> > > > > > > > > > > > argument, factual
> > > > > > > > > > > > grounding or authoritative underpinning, do not invite 
> > > > > > > > > > > > to a
> > > > > > > > > > > > development and deepening of themes, rather to mutual 
> > > > > > > > > > > > slogan-slinging.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > This is not to say that every entry in a discussion has 
> > > > > > > > > > > > to be a
> > > > > > > > > > > > discourse; the one-liner tope can be very effective in 
> > > > > > > > > > > > the context of
> > > > > > > > > > > > a good discussion - gabby frequently (not always :-)) 
> > > > > > > > > > > > achieves a
> > > > > > > > > > > > surgical precision here - but like any good 
> > > > > > > > > > > > rhetorical/discussive
> > > > > > > > > > > > device works best when used sparingly and discerningly. 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, we
> > > > > > > > > > > > could all just as well abandon Minds Eye and move to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Twitter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Alternatively, we could all become zen masters and talk 
> > > > > > > > > > > > to each other
> > > > > > > > > > > > in koans.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > paw's initial statement here begs so many questions as 
> > > > > > > > > > > > to become
> > > > > > > > > > > > almost meaningless. What do you mean by God? What is 
> > > > > > > > > > > > this [upper case]
> > > > > > > > > > > > "Glorifying" you are talking about? How does this 
> > > > > > > > > > > > benefit us? Does it
> > > > > > > > > > > > benefit God? What is obvious about this?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Wittgenstein ended the "Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus" 
> > > > > > > > > > > > with the
> > > > > > > > > > > > sentence, "Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, dar ber muss 
> > > > > > > > > > > > man schweigen /
> > > > > > > > > > > > Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent." 
> > > > > > > > > > > > At the moment,
> > > > > > > > > > > > reading many posts here, I incline towards the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > one-liner:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > If you've got nothing to say, then say nothing.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Francis
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 14 Mai, 02:28, "[email protected]" 
> > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The purpose of Life is to Glorify God, obviously- 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to