Perhaps some X is evil and some X is non evil while all Y is evil and all P is non evil in which case your proposition is invalid. Evil is not subjective because there is disagreement on the identification of an object as being evil or not evil but subjective based on the individual perception of what evil is. You say X is evil and I say X is not evil but your perception of evil is contrapositive and therefore subjective.
On Jun 27, 6:33 pm, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Lee, I'd point out that the very fact people disagree is what > indicates the question is objective, not subjective. About matters of > taste we don't dispute. About matters of truth we should dispute. If > you say X is not evil and somebody else says X is evil, I'd say one is > mistaken. What would make no sense is to say "we disagree about the > matter of X; therefore, X is subjective". > > On Jun 25, 1:22 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hey Alan, > > > I can see by this that what ought not to be is highly subjective. > > Abortion, stem cell research are just two cases where differance of > > opinion do occour. So If I say neither of these are evil and somebody > > disagress with me, then what is the truth of the matter? > > > On 25 June, 06:42, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Evil is what ought not be. > > > > On Jun 24, 1:51 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > A simple question, or is it?- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
