" About matters of taste we don't dispute." Alan, I 'm not sure if that 's true. I am not not even sure if you would regard this dispute as " matters of * truth.* "
On Jun 28, 4:33 am, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Lee, I'd point out that the very fact people disagree is what > indicates the question is objective, not subjective. About matters of > taste we don't dispute. About matters of truth we should dispute. If > you say X is not evil and somebody else says X is evil, I'd say one is > mistaken. What would make no sense is to say "we disagree about the > matter of X; therefore, X is subjective". > > On Jun 25, 1:22 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hey Alan, > > > I can see by this that what ought not to be is highly subjective. > > Abortion, stem cell research are just two cases where differance of > > opinion do occour. So If I say neither of these are evil and somebody > > disagress with me, then what is the truth of the matter? > > > On 25 June, 06:42, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Evil is what ought not be. > > > > On Jun 24, 1:51 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > A simple question, or is it?- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
