all we will ever know at the same time for all time... or ...knowing (and being) everyone and everything that ever was and ever will be and all that is...
On Jun 28, 8:09 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote: > Isn't that cosmic consciousness, Vam? > > On Jun 28, 6:24 am, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Jim, really speaking beyond mere more terms and thoughts, I do not > > even know how the dog derives many, many times more from the bone I > > discarded as nothing ! The fact is empirical. But do I understand > > it ? I do not know. > > > The other day, a journalist academic analysed racism and opined : We > > are not racists. Just that some among us are ignorant and, hence, > > display their prejudices which seem racist. That, I found, was a mere > > explanation of racist behaviour. It was irrelevent to the question : > > Are we racist ? > > > I believe that alongwith science, which indeed we might know > > everything of, we need to know the answer to such questions, which is > > what I am afraid we ALL will never know ALL at the SAME TIME, for ALL > > TIME. > > > On Jun 28, 1:20 am, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Looking back over recent decades it seems clear that we (mankind) is > > > coming to know, in a scientific sense, more and more about more and > > > more, and faster and faster. Will there ever come a time when we will > > > know everything about everything? > > > I’ve asked a number of people this question, and all say “no.” > > > But it > > > seems to me that the correct answer is “yes.” Why? > > > First, I’m talking about knowing all the scientific laws governing > > > the physical universe – nothing more, nothing less. The physical > > > universe is immense, but finite. Science has long assumed that the > > > laws governing our small bit of it are universal; they apply > > > everywhere in the universe just as they apply here. Given then that > > > the physical universe is finite, it would seem that the laws governing > > > it are also finite. And as we come to know them here faster and > > > faster, at some point it would seem that we will know everything about > > > everything. > > > This also seems to me to be consistent with what Einstein and > > > others > > > have long sought – the ultimate theory of everything. (This effort is > > > well described by Brian Greene in his book The Elegant Universe.) If > > > knowing everything were obviously not possible, surely this group > > > would never have begun pursuing that ultimate theory. > > > How might we tell when we are approaching the point where we know > > > everything? I expect the growth of knowledge is gaussian. As we > > > approach knowing everything the rate of knowledge growth will > > > gradually slow. So by monitoring this rate of growth we should be able > > > to predict when we will know everything. Right? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
