Well Gab's it's a myth isn't it so the roots may be virtualy untraceable. However my opinion is that boys do indeed cry, and those fathers that utter this myth when faced with crying sons, do their kids no favours really.
Happines, try cracking a joke in front of your friends. I assume that similar to myself in this age if 'puters and interweb thingy you have freinds from all over the place? Try the joke and let me know how much differance there is between the smiles and laughs. I was watching something on TV at sometime within the last two perhaps three years, and this very occourance happend, what struck me then was the way that a smile on the face of a human seemed to be reconised as a sign of happines, or maybe friendship, no matter what the nationality of the face it belongs to. On 6 July, 17:29, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > So where does this boys don't cry myth come from then? And is it > related only to the pain reaction or also to the happiness > demonstrations? > > On 6 Jul., 15:36, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Ohh I don't know. We are all the same species, there must be > > something that we can all agree on? > > > I mean if I punch a German in the face, I can almost garentee that the > > look on said face will be virtualy the same as the look an Egyptian > > would give me following the same treatment. > > > Which put another less wordy way means, we all react to pain in the > > same way, and I would guess happiness also. > > > On 5 July, 23:21, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > That you doubt the inherent value of our common source doesn't matter, > > > you know it IS :-) > > > > The I Ching, the Bible, the Koran and any other theology or philosophy > > > that pretends to teach "the way" for mankind, yes, out the window. > > > No dogma or idealism will ever be able to cross the barriers of > > > language and culture to establish Unity. > > > > peace & Love > > > > On Jul 5, 1:11 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > We may have started as one but we are many now and whether we will > > > > ever be one again remains to be seen. Yet in another sense we are all > > > > one since we had a common beginning but I doubt that is of any > > > > inherent value. Since we are many what about I Ching? Shall we throw > > > > I Ching out the window? (A small theft from Firesign Theatre, mea > > > > culpa.) > > > > > Onul l 4, 3:0pm, T Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > We need a common point for the cooperation of unity to begin :-) > > > > > > peace & Love > > > > > > On Jul 4, 2:15 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > That's true Rigsy. But we're just learning those ar. AnAnd given a > > > > > > dearth of cooperation, I'll opt for some co-dependency in small > > > > > > doses. It's a reasonable substitute. > > > > > > > On Jul 3, 1:41 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Thehere's a big difference between co-dependency and co-operation.- > > > > > > Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
