We may have started as one but we are many now and whether we will ever be one again remains to be seen. Yet in another sense we are all one since we had a common beginning but I doubt that is of any inherent value. Since we are many what about I Ching? Shall we throw I Ching out the window? (A small theft from Firesign Theatre, mea culpa.)
On Jul 4, 3:08 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > We need a common point for the cooperation of unity to begin :-) > > peace & Love > > On Jul 4, 2:15 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > That's true Rigsy. But we're just learning those arts. And given a > > dearth of cooperation, I'll opt for some co-dependency in small > > doses. It's a reasonable substitute. > > > On Jul 3, 1:41 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > There's a big difference between co-dependency and co-operation. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
