http://www.monsanto.com/products/techandsafety/fortherecord_science/2009/monsanto_food_safety.asp

I'm sure the issue of GMF's will remain debatable for many years to
come, long after I'm gone.



On Jul 19, 9:07 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Monsanto's business is creating unsafe food. but as my lawyer friend puts it
>
> "Deny, deny, deny even before you know the question. Automatically deny"
> Allan
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > It's funny that we've been through all this Monsanto business before
> > but still the unawareness of Genetically Modified Foods remains in
> > place.  I think that a simple observation of "seedless" foods should
> > be an indication of food tampering.  A visit to the farmers market the
> > other day revealed that some of the farmers are not sure if some of
> > their produce is of GMF seed origin.  The issue seems to be highly
> > shrouded in confusion and ignorance.  If there were enough voices to
> > protest the practice, there might be some changes for the better.
>
> > On Jul 16, 11:13 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > "Question is this, is there really enough food in the world to go
> > > around in it's "natural" state?" - SD
>
> > > Absolutely! Suggestions to the contrary are mostly from those with
> > > vested interests.
>
> > > "Can we feed the world on pure foods?" - SD
>
> > > Absolutely! (See above.)
>
> > > "What are we eating?" - SD
>
> > > "We"??? IF you mean most in the USA, then as I said, mostly GM foods
> > > and stuff from the 3 food groups, oil, sugar and salt. Me? I eat
> > > locally grown and almost entirely organic foods including animals that
> > > could walk ( and did ) using no growth hormones etc.
>
> > > On Jul 16, 6:16 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I don't think people in general have the slightest clue about food
> > > > modification nor do most pay any attention to ingredients.  I was at
> > > > the supermarket one day and saw this woman picking out some shredded
> > > > cheeses, I politely informed her that the cheese contained potato
> > > > starch, then pointed to the "ingredients list" which revealed as well
> > > > corn starch, calcium sulphate, natamycin among enzymes, cultures and
> > > > such.  Needless to say the woman was totally shocked that a package
> > > > labeled "Natural" cheese would have so much non cheese content.
> > > > Question is this, is there really enough food in the world to go
> > > > around in it's "natural" state?
> > > > Can we feed the world on pure foods?
> > > > What are we eating?
> > > > People are like lemmings and follow without question what appears to
> > > > be the right way to go.
> > > > It is not until disaster shows it's fangs that people start to
> > > > question their ignorance and trust.
> > > > People are easily duped.
>
> > > > On Jul 16, 2:28 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > “…HR 875 mandates that anyone who produces food of any kind – meat,
> > > > > milk, fruit, vegetables et cetera -  and transports that food for
> > sale
> > > > > be subject to warrantless government inspections of their farms and
> > > > > food production records….”
>
> >http://nourishedkitchen.com/fight-hr-875-food-safety-modernization-ac...
>
> > > > > At the end of the above article, the comment that “…eating is now a
> > > > > political act so exercise your rights.”
>
> > > > > It is followed with links to the bill itself.
>
> > > > > This issue, food, its production, sale, control etc. is one of the
> > > > > ‘big’ ones as I see it. The same for the right to die, health care,
> > > > > water etc. There are too many current day issues to be an effective
> > > > > and knowledgeable advocate for all that are important to us unless
> > one
> > > > > becomes a professional.
>
> > > > > Often, vested interests launch economic and propaganda wars against
> > > > > the general populous. The above is not exempt.
>
> > > > > Even though about 80% of our food id genetically engineered  and an
> > > > > equivalent amount is corn/soy based, public funding continues to
> > > > > support a system of monetarily based rather than health based
> > > > > production, distribution and sales due to the current lobbyist,
> > > > > funding and oversight situation. High fructose corn syrup is but a
> > tip
> > > > > of the iceberg.
>
> > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_fructose_corn_syrup
>
> > > > > And, as has been demonstrated by many, the total cost, including
> > > > > health costs as a result of a corporate controlled legal system,
> > would
> > > > > be much lower if we stop the ‘better living through chemistry’ model.
>
> > > > > One current day resource,http://www.foodincmovie.com/
>
> > > > > Before using any kneejerk reactions, please realize that much
> > > > > ‘information’ about such issues follows the model of what we learned
> > > > > from SIS.
>
> > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_Intelligence_Service
>
> > > > >http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Propaganda_techniques
>
> > > > > Hopefully more and more people can wean themselves from the pap
> > > > > presented by those who manufacture consent and look more objectively
> > > > > at what is in fact in their own self interest.
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_Consent:_The_Political_Eco...
>
> > > > > While this may appear to be a scattered ‘rant’, my current focus is
> > on
> > > > > our food supply and the gross results of the more recent changes
> > > > > therein. Diabetes is but one result. I started this piece out with HR
> > > > > 875. Please at least learn about it.
>
> > > > > Here endith the rant! :-)- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> (
>  )
> I_D Allan
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to