The Soviets were apt to write up the bear as a more likely human
ancestor and once claimed the dinosaurs went extinct through
constipation when a laxative plant they needed died out.  The Chinese
still teach that they are descended from homo erectus.  DNA is
somewhat more reliable than this  Clyde had a better attitude towards
politicians and bureaucrats than we seem to manage.  An Uncle Clyde
would be useful in my life!

On 23 July, 00:05, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
> You just knew I was going to do this, didn't you, Don? :-)
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFFr91atHqE&feature=related
>
> Francis
>
> On 22 Jul., 23:54, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > OMG.  GMTA.  Just saw your post after I posted mine.  It was Every
> > Which Way But Loose with Clint Eastwood.
>
> > dj
>
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:39 PM, iam deheretic<[email protected]> wrote:
> > > What was that line out of a famous movie scene? "Right turn Clyde! "
> > > Allan
>
> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Chris Jenkins 
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
>
> > >> From another list I'm on...chimps may not be our closest relative after
> > >> all?
>
> > >> From the Pittsburgh-Tribune Review. Anyone interested in a pdf of the
> > >> original article please let me know. John Grehan
> > >> Pitt anthropologist argues humans more like orangutans than chimps
> > >> A University of Pittsburgh anthropologist argues in a paper published
> > >> today that humans most likely share a common ancestor with orangutans, 
> > >> and
> > >> not chimpanzees, which is the prevailing belief.
>
> > >> Jeffrey H. Schwartz hopes the paper will get researchers to practice
> > >> fundamental science and question some assumptions.
> > >> "What I'll be happy with is if people actually think out of the box and
> > >> consider alternative theories of human relationships with apes," Schwartz
> > >> said Wednesday in a phone interview from Zagreb, Croatia.
>
> > >> He concedes it won't happen overnight, but the paper in the Journal of
> > >> Biogeography that he co-authored could help, said Schwartz, who's the
> > >> president of the World Academy of Art and Science.
>
> > >> "We've done the analysis," said John Grehan, who is the paper's other
> > >> co-author, director of science at the Buffalo Museum in New York and a
> > >> research associate at the Carnegie Museum of Natural History.
>
> > >> Jeffrey L. Boore, an adjunct biology professor at the University of
> > >> California-Berkeley who specializes in interpretive genome sequences, 
> > >> said
> > >> he knows of no strong reason to discount the DNA studies that have
> > >> demonstrated chimps and gorillas are more closely related to humans than
> > >> orangutans.
>
> > >> "The overwhelming majority of those studies have given very strong 
> > >> support
> > >> to excluding orangutans from the human-chimp-gorilla group," said Boore,
> > >> who's also CEO of Genome Project Solutions, Inc., in Hercules, Calif.
>
> > >> "If people disagree with it, they need to put out their evidence and let
> > >> it go back and forth," said Grehan, an entomologist who also studies the
> > >> origin and evolution of animals and plants. "But I think a lot of people 
> > >> are
> > >> incapable of dealing with it."
>
> > >> That's because for years most of the scientific community accepted DNA
> > >> analyses that suggest humans are most closely related to chimps, Schwartz
> > >> and Grehan said.
>
> > >> But an examination of fossil and other evidence shows humans and
> > >> orangutans share 28 features -- including reproductive systems, tooth
> > >> structures and mouth palates, the scientists say.
>
> > >> Schwartz and Grehan write in their paper that humans share only two
> > >> features with chimpanzees and seven with gorillas.
> > >> "In science, you must integrate the fossil record with the living 
> > >> record,"
> > >> Grehan said. "That's what we've done."
> > >> They propose a scenario that explains the migration of the 
> > >> human-orangutan
> > >> common ancestor from Southeast Asia, where modern orangutans are from.
>
> > >> The molecular evidence that scientists commonly cite to demonstrate the
> > >> link between humans and chimps is flawed, Schwartz said.
>
> > >> "Only 2 percent of the entire human genome can be verified," he said. 
> > >> "But
> > >> people are saying that chimps and humans share 98 percent of some 
> > >> portion of
> > >> that 2 percent to make their case."
>
> > >> That's not good science, said Malte Ebach, a paleontologist at Arizona
> > >> State University's International Institute for Species Exploration, who,
> > >> like Grehan, studies the origin and evolution of animals and plants.
>
> > >> "People think DNA data is better because they perceive it as
> > >> technologically superior and more progressive," Ebach said. "But 
> > >> technology
> > >> doesn't make data better."
>
> > >> Schwartz proposed his human-orangutan theory in 1982. He wrote the book,
> > >> "The Red Ape: Orangutans and Human Origins," in 1986 that expanded on 
> > >> those
> > >> ideas. In 2005, Schwartz published and revised an updated version of the
> > >> book.
>
> > >> The work was ignored as molecular studies came out that showed the
> > >> similarity between chimps and humans.
> > >> Grehan said alternative views should not be dismissed when a theory
> > >> becomes so accepted.
> > >> During the mid-20th century, scientists so fervently disagreed with
> > >> Barbara McClintock's theory that genes could move along a chromosome that
> > >> she stopped publishing, Grehan said. In 1983, McClintock won a Nobel 
> > >> Prize
> > >> for her research in "jumping genes."
>
> > >> Subscription options and archives available:
> > >>http://listserv.buffalo.edu/archives/anthro-l.html
>
> > > --
> > > (
> > >  )
> > > I_D Allan
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to