Excuse me the first line of my last post should have read....

...it is impossible to choose to not choose what one does choose...

On Jul 23, 6:59 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> I tend to think pretty biologically about control as it's deep-seated
> in many animal systems.  I think those moments when the conversation
> lowers when the boss turns up and when people start shuffling paper
> tell us a lot about control.  I don't believe in free will much, other
> than that we can choose to do the right thing or not - and are often
> too scared to do much other than follow the herd.  Leibniz made the
> arguments of Escher and Hofstader long ago and we might think of a
> world of logical possibility.  Self seems only known in social context
> and I fancy a better understanding of biology could be much more
> useful than philosophy in helping us be aware of what is happening to
> us as Don describes.  I suspect we have lost control in leadership and
> it's become nasty, bitchy (not much to do with the increased presence
> of women) and lacking in that empathy that tells us to respect others
> and only rarely over-ride their concerns.  The mechanisms in this are
> crude.
>
> On 23 July, 14:48, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > We do not choose to
> > like or dislike something, it is a reaction to established values,
> > imho.
>
> > This is true to a point.  However, one can change one's opinion or
> > have a seemingly incongruous opinion when it benefits the opiner.
> > For instance, hypothetically, I choose to like my sister-in-law.
> > Normally, I would never associate with or converse with or have
> > business with this person but the fact that she is my son's aunt and
> > loves him I tend to ignore the qualities about her I find
> > objectionable.  I am willing to help her when she needs it because she
> > is family and to make this easier on me I find things about her I like
> > and focus on these things.  Quite honestly I wouldn't have gone
> > through the effort if she wasn't my son's aunt.  Hypothetically
> > speaking.
>
> > Sometimes when under a great deal of stress I start to feel 'out of
> > control' or 'helpless.'  I recognize this and nip it in the bud.  I
> > take control, or the illusion of control, and mentally list my choices
> > and make a decision.  I'm under the most stress when I feel I don't
> > know how to handle a situation.  So I force myself to make a decision
> > and go with it and change it up later if it looks like it's not
> > working.  Doing nothing makes it ten times as bad.  Action, good or
> > bad, is linked with control.  IMO.  Those that do nothing are not in
> > control at all, they are at the mercy of those that act; good or bad.
>
> > dj
>
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:16 AM, deripsni<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I am not sure I would catagorize perception as controlled, but more
> > > reactionary, similar to an opinion. To me, an opinion isn't contrived,
> > > but is the result of variables, such as a comparison to established
> > > moral values, preferred individual taste, etc. We do not choose to
> > > like or dislike something, it is a reaction to established values,
> > > imho.
>
> > > On Jul 23, 6:23 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >> Mollay asks:
>
> > >> 'Do we have the power to create our realities?  Are we in control?
> > >> What do YOU think?
>
> > >> In many ways we do create our relalities, in the ways of how we
> > >> percive things certianly.  In realtion to how the world really is,
> > >> maybe not so much.
>
> > >> If we each look at a tree in the park, it is the same tree that we
> > >> stare at, even if our notice picks out things that others do not.  So
> > >> the tree is real, our perception of the tree may differ.
>
> > >> We do have the power of veto and I have long argued that this is the
> > >> very basis of free will, so yes the fact that we can and do make
> > >> descicions means we are in control.  Think of it like a cars gears.
>
> > >> Those that drive automatics cut out the need to manualy depress and
> > >> engage the clutch, the clutch is still engaged though, but the car
> > >> does not yet drive itself.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to