Real honest writers do not spend their precious time worried about their readers.
On Jul 24, 5:18�pm, deripsni <[email protected]> wrote: > Chaff sometimes makes it through the filter with the wheat. We are > probalby half full of it. In my opinion, it doesn't take long to > identify one from the other, and thus make the adjustment whether to > read the post or not. Stress is a factor I prefer not to include in > the equation. > > On 23 juil, 19:25, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > So be it, but there seems to be a dichotomy on member opinion > > regarding thread irrelevancy intrusion. �At the least I can say I have > > a legitimate excuse because I was awarded the only............. > > > � � � � � � � � � � �MEDAL > > > � � � � � Thread Purity Champion > > > � � � � � � � � � First Class > > > by Chris who in fact posted early to the puppy post �"relevance" Jul > > 23, 11:06 am, which is obviously a less than appreciative response. > > > I respectfully bow out, thank you. > > > On Jul 23, 5:58�pm, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 23 Jul., 23:15, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > . > > > ... �and also agree with Vam that> we should eliminate the puppy dung and > > > ornography and solidify the > > > > continuity of posts. �These inappropriate and irrelevant intrusions > > > > only serve as an impediment to the already difficult path to analysis > > > > and perspective of the complex thread topic, they are an obstacle to > > > > productive philosophy. > > > > As an aside I think that irrelevant posts should simply be removed by > > > > the moderation squad before they even get the opportunity to waste our > > > > mental energy upon reading them. �Why do they even appear? > > > > Sorry, Slip, I can't agree with this. > > > > Burn spammers at the stake by all means, and emasculate trolls with a > > > blunt rusty knife, but we should be careful about calling for active > > > moderation of posts with regard to quality of content or relevance. > > > This smacks for me of the kind of intellectual elitism which leads > > > eventually to a small number of self-satisfied illuminati lost in > > > wonderment at their own cerebral powers or arguing over the number of > > > quangles capable of dancing on the tip of a quantum pin. Apart from > > > anything else, the cut and thrust of discussion here is quite capable > > > of dealing with them and they are not infrequently the occasion of > > > insight on the part of another contributor, or at least some comic > > > relief. > > > > This is control degenerating into control-freakism. > > > > Streuth, 'tis indeed a strange world which has me riding in on a white > > > horse to defend puppy ...! > > > > Francis- Masquer le texte des messages pr�c�dents - > > > - Afficher le texte des messages pr�c�dents -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
