Yes, you should start your book soon as I enjoy your writing style. Sorta artsy. I know I'm not going to wait for the paperback version! Say, if you are only going to let your children read it, will you adopt me? ;-] (sorry, another off 'topic' post)
On Jul 25, 9:12 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > I really should write a memoir for the family before I kick the > bucket. I have so many tales to tell them that I have tucked away > while being their mom. And the occasional story misses the overview. I > think their reviews would be mixed- the eldest and youngest would be > uncomfortable- the two in the middle would enjoy and understand it, > Now- I have contradicted myself- I am prejudging my readers and would > that inhibit my writing? I tend to be very open and honest- or try to > be- and would I want to sugar-coat facts to create a mother-myth? I'll > think about that. > > On Jul 25, 7:30 am, deripsni <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Yes I agree. I am actually writing to myself. Better than talking to > > myself as others can't hear it ;-] > > > On Jul 24, 6:37 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Real honest writers do not spend their precious time worried about > > > their readers. > > > > On Jul 24, 5:18 pm, deripsni <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Chaff sometimes makes it through the filter with the wheat. We are > > > > probalby half full of it. In my opinion, it doesn't take long to > > > > identify one from the other, and thus make the adjustment whether to > > > > read the post or not. Stress is a factor I prefer not to include in > > > > the equation. > > > > > On 23 juil, 19:25, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > So be it, but there seems to be a dichotomy on member opinion > > > > > regarding thread irrelevancy intrusion. At the least I can say I have > > > > > a legitimate excuse because I was awarded the only............. > > > > > > MEDAL > > > > > > Thread Purity Champion > > > > > > First Class > > > > > > by Chris who in fact posted early to the puppy post "relevance" Jul > > > > > 23, 11:06 am, which is obviously a less than appreciative response. > > > > > > I respectfully bow out, thank you. > > > > > > On Jul 23, 5:58 pm, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 23 Jul., 23:15, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > . > > > > > > ... and also agree with Vam that> we should eliminate the puppy > > > > > > dung and ornography and solidify the > > > > > > > continuity of posts. These inappropriate and irrelevant intrusions > > > > > > > only serve as an impediment to the already difficult path to > > > > > > > analysis > > > > > > > and perspective of the complex thread topic, they are an obstacle > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > productive philosophy. > > > > > > > As an aside I think that irrelevant posts should simply be > > > > > > > removed by > > > > > > > the moderation squad before they even get the opportunity to > > > > > > > waste our > > > > > > > mental energy upon reading them. Why do they even appear? > > > > > > > Sorry, Slip, I can't agree with this. > > > > > > > Burn spammers at the stake by all means, and emasculate trolls with > > > > > > a > > > > > > blunt rusty knife, but we should be careful about calling for active > > > > > > moderation of posts with regard to quality of content or relevance. > > > > > > This smacks for me of the kind of intellectual elitism which leads > > > > > > eventually to a small number of self-satisfied illuminati lost in > > > > > > wonderment at their own cerebral powers or arguing over the number > > > > > > of > > > > > > quangles capable of dancing on the tip of a quantum pin. Apart from > > > > > > anything else, the cut and thrust of discussion here is quite > > > > > > capable > > > > > > of dealing with them and they are not infrequently the occasion of > > > > > > insight on the part of another contributor, or at least some comic > > > > > > relief. > > > > > > > This is control degenerating into control-freakism. > > > > > > > Streuth, 'tis indeed a strange world which has me riding in on a > > > > > > white > > > > > > horse to defend puppy ...! > > > > > > > Francis- Masquer le texte des messages pr c dents - > > > > > > - Afficher le texte des messages pr c dents -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
