Speaking on behalf of American chauvinists, I have to say we don't put
much stock in the UN.  They're pretty much a laughing stock to us and
we resent our tax money being wasted there.  The EU, however, was a
good idea and is working out perhaps even better then many
anticipated.  Bravo.

dj


On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Vamadevananda<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thorn, I spoke of the European Model, not merely of their welfare
> policy and taxation structure !  I see the latter as variables, that
> people in different nations may customise.
>
> What is of abiding interest, to me, is the spirit of cooperation it
> naturalises among ( formerly, at times, bitterly sparring ) nations,
> and makes it largely acceptable among citizens of diverse cultures in
> the many nations constituting the Community Of Nations.
>
> It is so much more effective at nurturing and fostering the
> transnational cooperation than, say,  the UN. Perhaps, because the EU
> Model is more democratic and representative of the common people
> within it. In stark contrast, the UN is only representative of the
> Govts in different countries, and that too is inequitous.
>
> It may be very difficult for the US, and American chauvinists, to
> appreciate that the UN ( which the US dominates ) is so lousy in
> effect compared to the EU ( which no one in particular overides ).
>
>
> On Jul 26, 6:47 am, Thorn <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I must say something about Eurpope leading the way for the poor..now
>> they get taxed 50% of their paycheck and this is half of what they
>> make so therefore this does keep the poor poor all their life until
>> they get aged..and then they get some what of a house or apt...and
>> medical ..than for a hip surgery you might get in at two years down
>> the line so let me ask you this so God forbid if that is a good
>> structure.....the poor should be thankful for that one -instead of
>> having more of their paycheck so they can live a better quailty life
>> while their younger and their family's..
>> thorn of a rose
>> On Jul 24, 11:53 am, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > I 'd agree, Don !  Not just the bomb, there are several very powerful
>> > despots / despotic cliques riding their respective proverbial tigers.
>> > There are massive armies, much arms and armaments around, quite some
>> > with non - state actors, too.  Several basic resources are projected
>> > to be in short supply.  There is this very real danger of present
>> > inequities getting far too magnified, eroding belief, respect and
>> > committment to ' universal ' values.
>>
>> > I believe that at some stage, we would not be able to afford power -
>> > and money - found competition.  Much will depend on whether we are
>> > able to live in cooperation, despite differences in power and riches,
>> > and national interests.  Cooperation at reducing pollution, and global
>> > warming, at making appropriate technologies available to poor and
>> > developing economies, whatever their capacity to afford, would
>>
>> > It is in this respect that the European model shows the way.  And, EU
>> > could do this still better.
>>
>> > On Jul 24, 11:12 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > > Sheesh.  I thought I had a swollen head.  This guy knows what it's
>> > > like to be the smartest person in the room.  That said, how in the
>> > > world can you speculate about 20 years from now and not even once
>> > > mention da BOMB?  I'm sure he did it on purpose but why?  Assuming
>> > > Europe isn't a giant crater by 2030 he may very well be correct.
>> > > Socialism will prevent people from improving themselves so our current
>> > > super-rich will become richer and not have to worry about competition
>> > > from new super-rich folk.  Europe's combined GDP has been larger then
>> > > the U.S. for several years now and I don't see that changing; ever.  I
>> > > personally believe even without a nuke going off in a major city his
>> > > outlook is entirely too rosy.
>>
>> > > dj
>>
>> > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:58 AM, 
>> > > frantheman<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > > > This is one vision of a possible world future:
>>
>> > > >http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,637830,00.html
>>
>> > > > Any comments?
>>
>> > > > Francis- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to