On Jul 30, 2:13 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> In reality then it is art. Can you really own a piece of art if you
> are not the creator of it?
>
> My first inclination is to say no.
Mine too. Art collectors would disagree. It is rather sad that a
painting for example, could be locked away for only a few people to
look at. Art items that cannot be duplicated?...what do you do with
those? Museums only?
Art should be shared, but I also think the artist should be paid to
share it, should he/she request that. If you want to give it away,
fine.
Do you think artists should be paid for their work? This is a model
that has a lot of controversy.
>
> On 30 July, 00:49, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 29, 12:51 pm, deripsni <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I didnt say "it is safe to say" I said "I think it is safe to say", so
> > > I was stating my opinion, not yours.
>
> > Either way, you would be stating your opinion, one is more "sure" than
> > the other, my fault.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
