On Jul 31, 3:41 am, deripsni <[email protected]> wrote: > Why do you feel that opinions should be considered accusations?
Only when they contain adjectives like "needy and insecure." Applied to a man you know nothing about, and who is not here to defend your smug psychological dashed off "opinion" of him. > If I > had a very high opinion of you and stated (with an adjective) that I > thought you were "awesome", would you consider this an accusation? Yes. And considering you don't know me, an empty one > so, don't worry, as I cannot forsee this happening any time soon. Me neither. > Regarding your statement "We are not going to get along all that well, > at least based on our shared "opinions" so far" ... I am not trying to > get along with you so feel free to despise me if you like ;-] In fact, > maybe you should reconsider responding to my posts completely, as you > seem to totally misunderstand and misrepresent them, and I am > definately tiring of responding to your misguided statements. Sorry to hear that. I thought we were in the process of trying to understand one another. (Note: "misguided" (adjective, invective...a rude conclusion based on limited support) > What gives you the impression that when I see an insecure person I run > up to them and say "You are insecure, do you mind if I try to help you > with this?" > You interject a lot of your own opinions about me without > having any idea of who I really am. A lot? Please show them and I will apologize (if that is true) >It seems you have this compelling > need to subject every sentence I make to minute scrutiny, That is my style and approach, apparently you do not care for it. I find that stopping at points that need clarification is an important step in understanding. >such as the > 15 minute expression. That was my humor. Again, we don't share my sense of humor apparently. > First of all, not everybody wants 15 minutes of > fame at all, despite the popularity of the statement, yet you want to > amend the sentence. Well then, start a crusade to have it changed. I > can't see what this has to do with me. I am conversing with you, that is what it has to do with you. > As far as us having "meaningful discussions in relative harmony", I am > still waiting for the first one and not looking forward to the next > one. Your choice > I am not insulted by your inability to grasp the simple concept > that I am trying to portray, or your abrasive posting style. So does this mean we will continue our conversations? > In fact, > from the other posts that I have seen so far, you seem rather needy of > acceptance yourself, or maybe your appologetic style is just an > attempt to disguise what you really want to say but don't think you > can get away with? I knew it was inevitable, the "starting to go after me" thing. No, you might look at my postings a different way, that is that I say exactly what I really want to say --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
