Sheesh. Dude, wouldn't it be easier just to keep the 'flock' stoned and surrounded by hot nymphomaniacs? I'm just sayin'.
dj On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 1:01 AM, BB47<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Jul 31, 6:44 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: >> No, the fear of the unknown has got to you. Tinker did stir it up by >> suggesting that we (mankind) could change the way of the world, > > Tinker, your vague website, that doesn't even explain what your > beliefs are, in any meaningful detail whatsoever, is not going to > "unite the world" > > You are going to have to do a little more. You can't even unite this > tiny group around you, and neither can I. We have been taking the > wrong approach, can you see that? I have taken the wrong approach > with you, and you with me. We need to adjust our methods. It seems as > if we don't know what the right method is. I think that is "safe to > say" (to borrow someone else's phrase) that based on the emperical > results of our interactions alone, "we" (you and me) are not showing > successful "results" here. > > You, want to save and unite the world. I would just like to > interact with people, find out how they think, learn from them, have > fun, be creative with my responses, argue about god, I am sick of > politics, so I just feel like discussing god. Well, I can't even get > you to define a damn thing you are talking about. Every answer you > give is so vague and you won't clearly define a damn thing. Your > answers leave me farther away from where we started. Is that your > goal? > > Let me offer a couple suggestions for uniting the world. Would that > be OK with you? If you won't offer concrete suggestions I will. > > 1) Be honest. As honest as you are able, at all times. Without us > being honest, nothing is going to change. Especially not us. > > 2) If your message is not getting through, change tactics. Try another > approach while remaining true to your message. Say it differently. > Elaborate perhaps, use an example. Mix it up. Add something, drop > something. > > 3) Express your ideas in every way you can. Try and win over as many > as you can. If you can't win this group, what are your chances for the > entire world? I suck at it, I think you might too. We have to find > one that sticks. Repeating things that did not work the first time, > is most likely not going to work the second time. You repeat your > phrases constantly, but you don't offer new back-up info with them. > At least not from what I have read. > > 4) You are going to have to adapt to other people and adjust. > Remaining the same, I do not believe, will get you maximum results. > Ask any salesman. > > 5) You are not "selling" your ideas. Ideas need to be "sold" Not for > money, but for "hearts and minds" Sad , but I think true. > This can be done in a million ways, you are only doing a couple of > them. People need to be CONVINCED of peace, you are not selling it. > Just because you put "peace and love" at the bottom of your messages, > does NOT mean you are convincing others. > You are going to have to do way more I am afraid. Arguments for it > for openers. You read these people in here? They are doing that, and > doing it GREAT. I have not read a single word of yours that argued > peace in a convincing manner. You ask for it, but you don't say what > we should do, or how we go about it. Why it has to stop? Just a > suggestion. Lead by example or action or words. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
