Highlander ho! and his bonnie Heather...great stuff.
On Aug 6, 4:10 pm, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Had to put this in before someone else did! Sorry, Don, I got there
> first :-)
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UymJaMOEpAs
>
> Francis
>
> On 6 Aug., 22:01, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Many of the recent threads - evolution, non-medical healing, are we in
> > control, Feynman's mysteries, etc. - seem to dance around on the
> > wavecrest of scientific discoveries. It strikes me that, given the
> > major scientific advances in recent decades and the increasing speed
> > of scientific progress, in the foreseeable future - 100 years maybe -
> > humans may be able to elect to live without aging. We might well be
> > able to maintain our bodies at age 30 or 40 or whatever as long as we
> > like. In other words, we might be able to choose to live forever.
> > If we accept that as a possibility, I wonder what sort of
> > philosophical issues it raises. How might our view of life and death
> > be changed, if at all? How would our economies adapt? Would people
> > still marry for life? Would it change communities? Would our
> > objectives - happy life, great wealth, friendships, learning, travel
> > etc. - change, and if so how? And how would we settle such issues?
> > Anyone care to pursue this thread? Jim
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
