On 19 Aug, 14:32, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Did Harrington exist while he was away? Perhaps he was just
> conserved, which is how energy is viewed in science rather than being
> created or destroyed? Energy, of course, seems to be in rather large
> 'presence' where we statistically detect and average of zero. Welcome
> back Pat. So who is pulling your strings mate?
>
There's only One that could! ;-) Of course I existed...it was
all of YOU that went away. From the right frame of mind, we can all
say with equal conviction, "verily I say unto you, before Abraham was,
I AM." Because, once something has been demonstrated to exist in
space-time, you can infer that it was always there. It's just that,
as we ride the shock-wave of movement, we can't see the waters ahead
of us. Note: Kabbalistically, this is a reference to the Creation-
story's concept of the separation of the waters. It was that
'separation of the waters' that was the folding and twisting and
contorting of energy that resulted in the divisions of space-time that
we see, including past (behind the wave), present (on the wave) and
future (waters yet to be reached by the shock-wave of movement) as
relatives.
> On 19 Aug, 12:50, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Umm interesting. What happens then to the energy that is sapped by
> > friction?
>
> > On 18 Aug, 18:27, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 18, 5:07 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > What prevents the understanding is a common platform/language in which
> > > > to discuss the issues. For example: Science has no problem with the
> > > > concept that energy is neither created nor destroyed;
>
> > > Actually, Justin pointed out that this is not actually the case. He
> > > claims there are respected physicists that claim that conservation of
> > > energy is not true in the universe as a whole. It only applies to
> > > closed systems. I liked that concept too! And you are using the
> > > energy thing! I like it, but Justin does not. He has good points.
> > > Could there be an error in the calculations? I think it might be
> > > possible. It is a big universe out there. Adding up all the energy?
> > > Way beyond me.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
