There is no argument with a warning, just the warning. Stop the behavior. It is not allowed.
On Aug 20, 7:19 am, deripsni <[email protected]> wrote: > I see, so those statement exceed the guidelines, but this one doesn't? > "In regard to Ian's inflammatory language, he has always used it and > no call to action to date has convinced him to stop. The moderators > here can be intimidating and aggressive, as Justin pointed out in the > copyright go round, and I do NOT appreciate it or find it acceptable. > But I do appreciate the fact that they provide us here the space for > dialogue that is rare, and try to keep that as my big picture, letting > their rude behavior roll off. I know that it reflects on them, not me. > I see more for them." > > Lets see if I got this right, its okay for you to call someone's words > rude and inflammatory, but not for me to call them caustic and > unfriendly? Its okay for you to call moderators intimitating and > aggressive, but my stating that someone is having an allergetic > reaction is not? Its okay for you to say that you "see more of > them" (meaning that you think much less of them), but its not okay for > me to say someone is freaking out (when he slammed the door shut on > the thread rather than respond to a ligitimate question). Funny how a > promotion to moderator changes ones outlook isn't it Molly? > > I hope you have fun throwing your new found weight around, although > you seem to be forgetting that you thought it was a good idea to do > moderator work in private emails rather than in a room. I also find it > funny that neither you nor Skip addressed the post I made where I > listed some of his unfriendly...sorry I mean, inflammatory remarks. If > you want to do a good job, I suggest that you act even-handed and > follow your own guidelines. > > I also notice that you did not respond to my post where I addressed > your not overly polite comments that social interaction in ME was at > the bottom of your methods of communicating, and questioned why I came > here. You may think that your posts were polite, but they were full of > negativity. You may very well try to disquise your emotions, but they > fly from the screen and they are not always very pleasant. As you > know, someone warned me about your Messiah complex. Well, I wouldn't > go that far, but it does seem that a bit of power is going to your > head. > > On Aug 20, 4:12 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think I will have a word and tell you, Allan, that: > > > " I often do find you > > > > caustic and quite unfriendly at times." > > > "Now you are having an allergic reaction to a simple > > > > question" > > > "presumabley because you would > > > > rather freak out than address the issues at hand" > > > "overbiting attitude of yours" > > > are all statements that exceed the guidelines so I will warn you to > > read the guidelines and stay within them. > > > On Aug 19, 5:40 pm, deripsni <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yes, you have the adjectives quite right Slip. I often do find you > > > caustic and quite unfriendly at times. I have listed several of your > > > spikes at people in a previous post, to which you did not respond, and > > > yet again. Now you are having an allergic reaction to a simple > > > question in regards to your comments about race and ethnicity (just so > > > we don't forget about your thread), presumabley because you would > > > rather freak out than address the issues at hand? I have no agenda > > > against you, I even like some of the stuff you say, but that > > > overbiting attitude of yours removes much of the enjoyment of your > > > words as I realize they are spoken with your head, and not your > > > heart. > > > > On Aug 19, 4:54 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Ripping? LOL > > > > > In part 1 of this thread you blast me........etc.<<e > > > > > Blast? Last time it was Caustic, wasn't it, e? > > > > > I have an idea e, I'll stay on my side of the street and you stay on > > > > yours. > > > > > Chao! > > > > > On Aug 19, 10:45 am, deripsni <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I did make a comment to you several days ago about the way you were > > > > > "ripping" other peoples posts. I did not get a response to that, but > > > > > if you feel that is what I am doing by simply reflecting off your > > > > > admonitions to me, so be it. One should carefully look at their own > > > > > posting style before stating that someone else is being disruptive. > > > > > > In part 1 of this thread you blast me for mentioning colour (which in > > > > > fact you brought up), and then you keep bringing up race in subsequent > > > > > posts, when in fact you are introducing a thread about ethnicity. When > > > > > I ask you to clarify the very issue that you knocked me for, you claim > > > > > that I am being disruptive? Add it up my friend, and see if this makes > > > > > any sense to you. Or is okay for you to just crash into others at > > > > > will, and then strike back when they say ouch? > > > > > > On Aug 19, 9:45 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Perhaps yours are, "e space" aka deripsni. > > > > > > It doesn't take much to put together a congruency in language > > > > > > pattern > > > > > > and style especially when the end results seem to lead to the same > > > > > > exasperation. It seems more time is being spent on tearing and > > > > > > shredding than constructive discourse. A simple look at the past > > > > > > reveals a strikingly similar comparative. It's already overly > > > > > > disruptive and it started out that way for you early on didn't it, > > > > > > deripsni? > > > > > > > On Aug 19, 5:11 am, deripsni <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > You've turned rather nasty lately Iam. Wha'ts up with that? I > > > > > > > brought > > > > > > > up a legitimate point. Are your true colours starting to show? > > > > > > > > On Aug 19, 2:46 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hmm > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:17 PM, deripsni <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I guess I am a bit confused. In part 1 of this thread, you > > > > > > > > > stated that > > > > > > > > > I was trying to start a race war by talking about race rather > > > > > > > > > than > > > > > > > > > ethnicity, yet your words in this post identify people > > > > > > > > > according to > > > > > > > > > their skin colour (race). What am I missing? > > > > > > > > > > Your Brain? > > > > > > > > > Allan > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > ( > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > I_D Allan- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
