On Aug 20, 3:05 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Ahh but that is more to the point though isn't it.
>
> Now either your stance is objectively correct or Ian's is, or you are
> both wrong.
True!
The truth, I mean the real objective true and valid
> reason exists, and to call differant understandings of it
> 'philophosfical differances' well thats just lieing isn't it?
No! That is what we do in here, discuss those things. Since we (I)
do not have access to universal absolute truth (he might) well then
we chew the cud about it all. You don't like philosophy?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
