what an all engaging war it is, my friend. I will fly the banner of peace for you, in the land of the microbe and across the globe.
On Aug 22, 11:11 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > The concept of self, or more specifically the sense of unity of self, > has both synchronic ('I seem to be a unified self at any given > moment') and diachronic ('I seem to be the same self as I was a few > minutes/hours/months/years ago') aspects. Currently, I am feeling > rather broken - like my watch with the dud battery, but with the added > knowledge (Slip was right) that my kinetic watch was stolen. I'd be > intuiting Orn but am otherwise engaged in a war against a microbe > horde in need of eviction from my glandular system and, unlike my > watch, am on tickover until the antibiotics triumph. Before Slip > points out electronic watches don't tick, let me say that this watch > has a very annoying, non-syncopating tick option, and my other > (stolen) watch may well be ticking to someone else's tune. I am so > ill I have developed an interest in Willard Quine again and have > somewhat naturalised my philosophy so as not to be too exposed to the > risk of theoretical truth. All this at a time I haven't had a drink > for two weeks Francis! - no doubt causing my current delusive state in > which England are regaining the Ashes. Test Match Special will set > you free ... > > On 22 Aug, 15:24, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I am not expert of Jung, but have enjoyed his writing and work now and > > then. I think what this means is that there is something more than > > what we think of as cause and effect at play here. That while, as > > Slip suggests, sychronistic events for us are responsive to our > > individual thoughts and feelings, we do not cause them to come about > > like we cause a stone to roll by kicking it. Synchronicity is, I > > think, always at play in our lives, but our awareness of it increases > > as our perception of the more subtle levels of being changes. We > > don't cause it, we become aware of it by tuning into it. > > > On Aug 22, 7:37 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I would wonder the same thing about it all being acausal. I remember > > > when my mother in law died my wife, a life long devout catholic, > > > mentioned something about a sign, a butterfly that would appear. I > > > always thought that to be coincidence but at the cemetery, there it > > > was, a large white butterfly that landed and stay for several minutes > > > then casually flew off. I guess there is some synchronicity there, > > > in the death, the mention of and appearance of the butterfly. > > > > On Aug 22, 12:33 am, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Great question. As a believer I wonder why Jung calls synchronicity > > > > 'acausal' in that essay "Synchronicity, An Acausal Connecting > > > > Principle". Does he embrace a Humean notion of causality as constant > > > > conjunction in which causes precede effects temporally? > > > > > Yet I do find myself reluctant to jump in with both feet and call > > > > something a meaningful coincidence. This is no doubt my inner atheist > > > > whispering. As a believer I know synchronicity under a different name: > > > > providence. God always meets our real needs. Sometimes I see the > > > > pattern and call it providence. Usually I do not, perhaps because it > > > > is to bright for my minds eye. > > > > > On Aug 21, 5:08 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Synchronicity is a word that has come up now and then in these > > > > > discussions and is, I think, becoming more a part of our scientific > > > > > and philosophic paradigms. Webster defines it as: the quality or > > > > > state of being synchronous or simultaneous : concurrence of acts, > > > > > events, or developments in time : coincident movement or existence; > > > > > chronological arrangement of historical events and personages so as to > > > > > indicate coincidence or coexistence; a representation in the same > > > > > picture of two or more events which occurred at different times. > > > > > > Jung required a larger framework for his idea of synchronicity, a > > > > > framework that reveals an underlying pattern for what he called > > > > > "temporally coincident occurrences of acausal events." > > > > > > What does synchronicity mean to you? What role does it play in your > > > > > life? What do YOU think? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
