Neither, Facilitator:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:47 AM, facilitator <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> What is a "Troll" anyway?  Someone you disagree with or someone you
> "really" disagree with?
>
> On Aug 25, 10:40 am, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The interesting thing is, Molly, that it isn't all bad (as
> > Frank'n'furter remarked to Jannette in the Rocky Horror Picture Show,
> > after she'd been unfaithful to Brad with him :-))
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVv9GjTXJ2A&feature=related
> >
> > The passing of a troll through the waters of ME leaves all sorts of
> > new counter-currents and unexpected eddies and in such circumstances
> > creative and positive things can (and do) happen. I've used the
> > analogy (even if scientific accuracy forces me to sadly admit that it
> > has no basis in fact) of the grain of sand in the oyster. Despite the
> > increased stress and frustration, shaking us up a bit can also be
> > good.
> >
> > Francis
> >
> > On 25 Aug., 15:42, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > An interesting study in humanity, here in the Internet forums, isn't
> > > it Jim?  Not only do we learn about ourselves, some of the brilliant
> > > ideas of our world, but also the aspects of human nature that may have
> > > been hidden before.
> >
> > >  I once had an internship as part of a class with a suicide hotline.
> > > In the five day training, we were told that most of the callers do not
> > > have suicide intentions, but have other mental health problems that
> > > lead them to continuously call the hotline.  The program developed a
> > > policy where these callers were allowed to call once in a 4 hour
> > > period (a working shift) and there were those callers that always
> > > exceeded the guidelines, and made a game of intrigue out of trying.
> > > The philosophy of the program in accepting these calls was that it is
> > > a service to the community, to give these folks an outlet to talk to
> > > someone, and the families some relief in the overwhelming duty of
> > > caring for them, some break or downtime in their attention to them.
> >
> > > My gut feeling is that these are the Internet trolls that play with
> > > the forums.  They run the spectrum of intelligence, indeed, some are
> > > highly intelligent, but have a borderline social functionality for
> > > other reasons.  The best we can do, and I think this group does a
> > > pretty good job of it, is express compassion and let the mods provide
> > > enough filter so that they are not disruptive to the group.  It is not
> > > easy to see them coming sometimes, the eventually the signs surface,
> > > and then we can, as compassionately as possible, establish the
> > > boundaries.  These folks look for flame wars to enter, pouncing on
> > > signs of controversy and disrespect.  The flame goes up when we react
> > > to their bait.  Let's not give it to them.
> >
> > > On Aug 25, 9:28 am, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Fran - oh. It was? damn. Jim
> >
> > > > On Aug 24, 4:41 am, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > I just got a private mail from e_space, congratulating me on having
> > > > > taken a more aggressive atitutude towards the mods.
> >
> > > > > As I explained to him in a private mail, I now reiterate in the
> public
> > > > > forum lest, improbably, some readers may not have understood ...
> >
> > > > > People, it was satire, ok?
> >
> > > > > Francis
> >
> > > > > On 24 Aug., 08:59, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Selected takes from Surveillance System 3BE-45 / [various dates]
> /
> > > > > > rating: TS (Board members only)
> >
> > > > > > Mod#1: I’m worried about BB. He’s getting too close.
> >
> > > > > > Mod#2: You mean …?
> >
> > > > > > Mod#1: Yes, he may just be getting to a level where he starts to
> > > > > > conceive suspicions about our true intent and purpose.
> >
> > > > > > Mod#2: The achievement of total and complete word domination?
> >
> > > > > > Mod#1: Precisely. This COULD become a new keith/Kevin attack.
> >
> > > > > > Mod#2: You mean, the longer you leave it, the worse it gets? If
> that’s
> > > > > > the case, then we’d better do something soon –
> >
> > > > > > [Com unit blinks. A crackle of static.]
> >
> > > > > > FA#7: Field agent seven here. Mod#1, are you there?
> >
> > > > > > Mod#1: Go ahead, FA#7, communications secured …
> >
> > > > > > [short break – a new camera angle]
> >
> > > > > > FA#7: … and we’re just not succeeding in our attacks on him in
> the
> > > > > > various threads. We can’t seem to faze the guy …
> >
> > > > > > Mod#2: How do you know it’s a guy?
> >
> > > > > > FA#7: Oh … oh, I see. We need more concrete information in order
> to …
> >
> > > > > > Mod#1: … in order to deal with this situation – in a more
> permanent
> > > > > > manner …
> >
> > > > > > Mod#2: Quite! Nothing must be allowed to disturb our glorious
> course
> > > > > > of world domination. The Dark Side WILL conquer!
> >
> > > > > > On 23 Aug., 23:11, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > >   There are many ways to look at this group.  This is merely my
> dark
> > > > > > > version.  I will give you the upbeat positive version when I am
> in
> > > > > > > that mood, should I survive.
> >
> > > > > > >    There is a sickness lurking in this group.  A stench fills
> the
> > > > > > > air.  I might be alone in smelling it.  A cancer has a
> foothold.  A
> > > > > > > callous detachment, a resignation, the players separated into
> packs
> > > > > > > and lone individuals.  The once human eyes roll back white, and
> when
> > > > > > > the attack is over, they roll forward to reveal their black ,
> cold ,
> > > > > > > unaffected stares. It is a prison yard, a shark tank.  If only
> being
> > > > > > > wrong was not the ultimate horror of human beings.  What a
> different
> > > > > > > world we would live in.
> >
> > > > > > >    There is less and less risks taken in here, and who could
> blame
> > > > > > > them? There are those safe in the shadows, who only come out to
> feed
> > > > > > > when it is safe.   Safety itself is now defined as back into
> self,
> > > > > > > where “I know and they don’t” rules supreme.    I see this as a
> sad
> > > > > > > statement of resignation and worship of a false idol.   An
> acceptance
> > > > > > > that this is the way of the world.  Any attempts at engagement
> are too
> > > > > > > easily  perceived as an assault or an attack,  then what
> follows is
> > > > > > > the silent retreat back to the perception of safety and
> > > > > > > righteousness.  Oh, the comfort of knowing  and they don’t.
> >
> > > > > > >    Another shank stabbing  in the prison yard?  “That is what
> > > > > > > happens”   “he had it coming”   “he should have known better”
> “You
> > > > > > > just don’t do that”  “He was a fool to try that”  “you don’t
> mess with
> > > > > > > somebody tougher than you”   “He picked the wrong person to
> fight
> > > > > > > with”    “doesn’t he know that guy’s reputation?  What an
> idiot”
> > > > > > > “You don’t mess with those above you in the pecking order, how
> could
> > > > > > > he not know that?”
> > > > > > > “He deserved it”  “hey, there is going to be a fight, come on
> let’s
> > > > > > > watch”  “I pay not attention to him, he is a child”  “ I am
> going to
> > > > > > > stick it to him someday”
> >
> > > > > > >     People resort to using quotes of famous people.  Not that
> this is
> > > > > > > bad in and of itself, for it is valuable information,  but when
> looked
> > > > > > > at from the view of the prison yard,  this scores big points,
> it is
> > > > > > > relatively safe,  and it is certainly safer than using your own
> words
> > > > > > > which are much more vulnerable to attack.  It is like flashing
> a knife
> > > > > > > to another inmate,  “I have this weapon and more where that
> came from
> > > > > > > pal....at my fingertips, don’t mess with me.   I have
> protection.  I
> > > > > > > have back-up.  I have the CREDIBILITY,   I can’t be touched,
> don’t
> > > > > > > even try.  You are no match for me.”
> >
> > > > > > >   As if being no match for another means a student can’t argue
> with
> > > > > > > the teacher.  The climate of fear, the climate of the pecking
> order,
> > > > > > > the climate of a prison yard.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>  >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to