So, since to me,
having a view that sees the world as a place to be afraid of is an
ilness, perhaps those who see it that way can reconsider their
situation a little? -Orn

Nah, I'd rather you changed your core philosophy to match mine...   budda
bump bump!

I see it less as fear and more as wariness.  To put it in perspective; I'm
more worried about my son's grades this year then any fear Russia or N.
Korea might try to bomb us soon.  Intellectually I know that Obama wants a
strong USA and his apparent lack of backbone is due to his naive attempt to
develop a rapport with terror supporting rogue states.  So far, I've seen
nothing but embarrassment from this tactic.

I think laying down and exposing your throat to the enemy is generally a bad
idea.  Putting terrorists on early release(couldn't resist, arch) and
dragging our greatest war on terror assets(CIA) through the mud seems bad
policy and, I hope, will end up being bad politics.  Obama has condemned(to
his credit) the early release but remains mute on the witch hunt going on
against CIA agents.  It can only have a negative effect on moral and could
ruin our best chances of getting life saving information in the future.
Time will tell but I think US Attorney General Eric Holder's days are
numbered.  There are many tire tread marked bodies in the wake of the Obama
bus and I suspect Mr. Holder may soon decide to spend more time with his
family.  Or drop the case.

dj

On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:08 PM, ornamentalmind <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> "... If I believed
> like R. Kennedy and Molly that most folks wanted to help everyone else
> I
> might go right along with socialism with the rest of you guys.  But I
> don't.  There's the rub." - DJ
>
> Don't forget HHDL! He is among that esteamed group too.
>
> Of course, how we 'see' and believe is based upon our life
> experiences. Just because one was born into a family of means does not
> mean that person will see nor find the world to be a friendly place.
> Psychology and other sciences can support this.  So, since to me,
> having a view that sees the world as a place to be afraid of is an
> ilness, perhaps those who see it that way can reconsider their
> situation a little?
>
> On Aug 28, 4:11 am, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It sounds to me like you'd like to see the elimination of commerce.  That
> is
> > impossible.  Ever since the first caveman traded a dead rabbit for sexual
> > favors we've had commerce and it is a part of society.  Everybody working
> > together and sharing everything equally might work if everyone WAS equal.
> > Some folks are harder workers, smarter, more knowledgeable, better
> looking
> > and have better teeth then others.   Until we're all clones of one
> another
> > we'll have commerce even if its some form of crude barter.  and we'll
> always
> > want what others have.
> >
> > Ok, this question isn't even sarcastic.  I'm being serious.  How come I
> > understand exactly what BB is talking about and others don't?  If I
> believed
> > like R. Kennedy and Molly that most folks wanted to help everyone else I
> > might go right along with socialism with the rest of you guys.  But I
> > don't.  There's the rub.
> >
> > dj
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:28 AM, [email protected] <
> >
> >
> >
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Can you prove that in order for such a system to work that people
> > > > > would have to be forced to provied 'free stuff'?
> >
> > > > You have not provided even an inkling of a "system"  let alone me
> > > > being able to prove anything against it.  You go ahead and show me
> how
> > > > it works and I will show you the force.
> >
> > > Sorry BB that is not how it works.  Shall we remind ourselves what is
> > > going on here?
> >
> > > I have given no system except to say lets ban money lets get rid of
> > > the whole concept of it.  I have admited that it is merely an
> > > idealsitic propersition and that I have no idea how to implement such
> > > a system.  But here is the crux.  You claimed that such a system would
> > > be unethical, I asked how so, you replied because it would force
> > > people into give you 'free stuff'
> >
> > > My request to you is simply this, proove to me that such a system
> > > would force people into giving you free stuff.  You said it, you must
> > > belive it so show me why you belive it.  There is no question of my
> > > needing to proove any thing to you, I made no claims whilst you
> > > certianly have.
> >
> > > > > Yes it is a legal requirment here in the UK to ensure that your
> > > > > children are educated.  I.E. If you let your child skip school you
> can
> > > > > be prosecuted.
> >
> > > > Another lovely step taken in the "spirit" of the controlling state.
> > > > Are students jailed for failing to graduate?  You might want to add
> > > > that step next. And I think you should just force feed socialism and
> > > > communism in the curriculum while you are at it, as it is obviously
> > > > "correct" isn't it?  Of COURSE it is!  So why teach anything else?
> > > > You need to control all those wrong thoughts. Don't even let those
> bad
> > > > thoughts start.
> >
> > > Come on now, lets not start with the 'unreasonable' leaps of
> > > sillyness.  Why would a legal requirment for parents to get their
> > > children educated end in arrest for students who fail to graduate?
> > > Get ahold of your temper man, and think about what you are putting
> > > down in writting here.
> >
> > > >  Deciding what is best for others is best!  They don't "know" what is
> > > > best for them.  Forced education of forced ideas!  What could be
> > > > better than that?  It is what is good for all.
> >
> > > Again where did this rant come from, what is it's porpuse and it's
> > > relevance to what we are talking about?- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to