Ha! One could argue a lunatic is happy as he/she has divorced the mind/
memory from the suffering in the world. ("The King of Hearts"-movie)
Hard to believe I once wrote a term paper on Kant's "Critique of Pure
Reason"- what was I thinking? :-)

On Sep 2, 3:48 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> Kant's description of happiness is, "continuous well-being, enjoyment
> of life, complete satisfaction with one's condition."  One could also
> say it is the enjoyment of all life's pleasures without the pains.  He
> also states that happiness is ".....the state of a rational being in
> the world in the whole of whose existence everything goes according to
> his wish and will."  I'm thinking that in this sense happiness is
> having all your wants fulfilled. Surely the moralistic aspects are
> complex and confusing therefore I had put them aside and rather have
> put sight into the "duty" of assuring happiness in one's life.
> Obvious is the degree to which many suffer from unhappiness.  Is it
> their failure to recognize a duty to assure happiness in their lives?
> Kant's example of the person seeking wealth sets forth a number of
> contrapositives, such as "if you have wealth, you are happy", with the
> word wealth being replaced by numerous substitutions.
> Kant states, "The problem of determining surely and universally which
> action would promote the happiness of a rational being is completely
> insoluble."  That would be true because "happiness is not an ideal of
> reason but of imagination."  I would think this makes it highly
> subjective.  This also leads me to believe that it isn't possible for
> everyone to make decisions and choices that ultimately lead to
> happiness.  Kant adds, "The more a cultivated reason purposely
> occupies itself with the enjoyment of life and with happiness, so much
> the further does one get away from true satisfaction."  That we have
> our own individual will and the ability of individual choice obviously
> can lead us away from happiness, if it were all instinctive then we'd
> all automatically be happy.  Therefore we get back to the duty of
> assuring happiness in our lives. Should we begin each day with a quest
> for happiness, live with intent to secure happiness in our lives?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to