Extra credit, no doubt...

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:02 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Quite lovely Vam - thank heavens I now have inadequate energy for such
> cosmic questing!  Altruistic animals can logically survive as the
> advantage they give is to a group which thus is more likely to survive
> than groups without it.  I read somewhere of women who become
> 'promiscuous' when pregnant - explained as 'wanting the fish for the
> baby brought by the lover' (altruism on behalf of the off-spring or
> them selfish genes acting from the womb?).  I remember a good
> socialist friend who never quite realised it might just be altruistic
> to let others do something to please him because of the pleasure they
> would get.  There are complex rules of the gift in 'primitive'
> societies - the giving giving an obligation.  There can be pleasure in
> giving pleasure.  I would have been a bad client for prostitutes,
> given my aversity to short time and forced labour.  Slip points out
> that the good guys finish last, and I was never premature.  Tit for
> tat is often the best strategy once the free-riders are spotted and
> ignored.  No doubt we are transactional.  Given we are deceivers, how
> do we tell much about much?  Knowledge of likelihood of fair return in
> a world admitting to selfishness might lead to the trust to do
> something rather than just subsist.  Fair return might well be linked
> to spiritual rules in a community, even law.  We should do more in
> life to find our sweet spots and beware the ghastly feigning of
> sincerity of the Blairs and TV presenters - and the meritocracy of the
> selfish.  This may lead us to the selfish pleasures of helping - a
> state entirely different from selfish ripping-off.  The pursuit of the
> extirpation of metaphysics is, of course, metaphysical.  Not all
> selfishness is the same.  Origins are noble and ignoble.
>
> Yup Molly - Rand isn't as 'straw' as she can be made out to be.  The
> worst people I have met have had low self-esteem yet regarded
> themselves as superior to others.  I shall exit stage left for a night
> of altruistic passion based on a woman daft enough to buy the drinks
> as part of her selfish plan to glean pleasure credits from me ...
>
> On 8 Sep, 17:42, Vam <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Another way describing the ' leela ' of ( Maya and ) Brahman, as it
> > appears :
> >
> > " Maithun - The bliss in union of Purush ( Self ) and Prakriti ( His
> > Nature ) is Maithun. These Purush and Prakriti tattwas ( potencies )
> > are active in sadhaks ( seeker's ) own body. On one side of Abyakta
> > Peetha ( Unmanifest playground ... Mind ! ? ) is prakriti tattwa and
> > another side is purusha. The creation and destruction process of this
> > universe are but various bliss currents of this union. When sadhaka
> > crosses the barrier of the "Ahang Granthi" ( the self - ego -
> > consciousness, the idea of oneself ), the entire universe becomes his
> > playground and he can directly feel the unified bliss of purusha and
> > prakriti in the cosmos. This is maithun ( the act of interpenetration,
> > unification ). A fraction of this bliss is present in the
> > "Milan" ( intercourse ) of a man and a woman. Hence every Jiva
> > ( individuated being, one with the idea of oneself ) is so much
> > attracted and attached to."
> >
> > " ... The inclusion of actual sex in tantra may be due to buddhist
> > influence."
> >
> > The translations in ( ) are mine.
> >
> > On Sep 8, 9:02 pm, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 8 Sep., 16:54, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >      Funny thing, though, altruism, in a monistic system, is the
> > > height
> >
> > > > of selfishness.  But, of course, that's EVERY reason to perform
> > > > altruistic acts because it's how we treat others that is how we treat
> > > > ourselves.
> >
> > > Or you could describe monism as being supremely, divinely
> > > masturbatory ... God playing with him/her/itself :-)
> >
> > > Francis
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to