"...the concept of "The Throne of God"..." - Pat

And, what about the Crown of God?

On Sep 11, 5:17 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11 Sep, 12:37, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I don't agree with that.  I think it is the greatest story ever told
> > (not original, I know.)  But read and you will find myriad
> > interpretations of the bible.  It wasn't until I was able to read it
> > for myself, and feel the stories alive in me, that I understood the
> > greatness of the stories.
>
>     I find the same thing with the Zohar.  I'm just starting my third
> reading of it and, already, I've found a few more gaps in my theory
> being filled by it (through careful, monistic interpretation).  For
> example, the concept of "The Throne of God" (a euphemism for the space-
> time continuum) being upheld by the four "Holy Living Creatures" is a
> perfect analogy of the four dimensions of our space-time.  They are
> called 'living' because they move (due to the expansion of space-
> time).  The Eagle is height, the Ox is width (as an ox usually stands
> with its side to you in a non-aggressive way), the Lion is depth (as
> it's most likely to charge directly at you) and Man is representative
> of time, as we are the creatures who seem to most readily perceive
> it.  This paints the vision of Ezekiel into a vision of the universe
> as seen from the outside (if that were possible).
>
>
>
> > On Sep 11, 3:34 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Adam the bible is interesting but mostly fiction and or twisted ideas ...
> > > etc etc
> > > Allan
>
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Adam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > OK. If the Bible is true, then I think I have given a good summary of
> > > > how things are.
> > > > If not, then it doesn't matter anyway. I posted this same article on
> > > > alt.bible.prophecy
> > > > and got only one reply, and that was abusive. And they are supposed to
> > > > believ in God!!
> > > > Adam.
>
> > > > On Sep 10, 2:30 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > This is true, Adam, but you are riding the fence.  Obviously the
> > > > > content of the article (thread) is about scripture, which as we all
> > > > > know is founded upon a belief, a concept, therefore it would follow
> > > > > that any and all posts would address that concept.
> > > > > I understand that you are 'not' presenting a position which posits the
> > > > > existence of God, a God or any Deity, but simply presents questions
> > > > > relating to the concept of such an existence.  However, still and
> > > > > without any veering, it is still a thread based upon a conceptual
> > > > > God.  A discussion in it's most simplistic form regarding "scripture"
> > > > > is indeed a discussion of a conceptual deity.
>
> > > > > On Sep 9, 10:13 pm, Adam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > What I wrote was not intended to be a proof of the existence of God 
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > of the truth of the Bible. It was just a summary of the things that 
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > had discovered through extensive reading of the scriptures. So when
> > > > > > some of you attacked the concept of God rather than the content of 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > article I did not feel obliged to defend that concept. Others can do
> > > > > > that more effectively than I.
> > > > > > Adam.
>
> > > > > > On Sep 9, 7:34 pm, "[email protected]" 
> > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I guess Adam may have been a boxer in a past life, a quick jab in 
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > then back out agian.
>
> > > > > > > On 5 Sep, 05:38, Adam <[email protected]> wrote:- Hide quoted
> > > > text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > --
> > > (
> > >  )
> > > I_D Allan- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to