This is true, Adam, but you are riding the fence. Obviously the content of the article (thread) is about scripture, which as we all know is founded upon a belief, a concept, therefore it would follow that any and all posts would address that concept. I understand that you are 'not' presenting a position which posits the existence of God, a God or any Deity, but simply presents questions relating to the concept of such an existence. However, still and without any veering, it is still a thread based upon a conceptual God. A discussion in it's most simplistic form regarding "scripture" is indeed a discussion of a conceptual deity.
On Sep 9, 10:13 pm, Adam <[email protected]> wrote: > What I wrote was not intended to be a proof of the existence of God or > of the truth of the Bible. It was just a summary of the things that I > had discovered through extensive reading of the scriptures. So when > some of you attacked the concept of God rather than the content of the > article I did not feel obliged to defend that concept. Others can do > that more effectively than I. > Adam. > > On Sep 9, 7:34 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I guess Adam may have been a boxer in a past life, a quick jab in and > > then back out agian. > > > On 5 Sep, 05:38, Adam <[email protected]> wrote: --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
