[The previous message was brought to you by the NRA.] ;-)
On Sep 13, 11:54 am, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ah, yes. My favorite part in that movie was when Moses says "You can
> have these tablets when you take them from my cold, dead hands!"
> Thrilling!
>
> dj
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I don't agree with that. I think it is the greatest story ever told
> > (not original, I know.) But read and you will find myriad
> > interpretations of the bible. It wasn't until I was able to read it
> > for myself, and feel the stories alive in me, that I understood the
> > greatness of the stories.
>
> > On Sep 11, 3:34 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Adam the bible is interesting but mostly fiction and or twisted ideas ...
> >> etc etc
> >> Allan
>
> >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Adam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > OK. If the Bible is true, then I think I have given a good summary of
> >> > how things are.
> >> > If not, then it doesn't matter anyway. I posted this same article on
> >> > alt.bible.prophecy
> >> > and got only one reply, and that was abusive. And they are supposed to
> >> > believ in God!!
> >> > Adam.
>
> >> > On Sep 10, 2:30 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > This is true, Adam, but you are riding the fence. Obviously the
> >> > > content of the article (thread) is about scripture, which as we all
> >> > > know is founded upon a belief, a concept, therefore it would follow
> >> > > that any and all posts would address that concept.
> >> > > I understand that you are 'not' presenting a position which posits the
> >> > > existence of God, a God or any Deity, but simply presents questions
> >> > > relating to the concept of such an existence. However, still and
> >> > > without any veering, it is still a thread based upon a conceptual
> >> > > God. A discussion in it's most simplistic form regarding "scripture"
> >> > > is indeed a discussion of a conceptual deity.
>
> >> > > On Sep 9, 10:13 pm, Adam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > What I wrote was not intended to be a proof of the existence of God
> >> > > > or
> >> > > > of the truth of the Bible. It was just a summary of the things that I
> >> > > > had discovered through extensive reading of the scriptures. So when
> >> > > > some of you attacked the concept of God rather than the content of
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > article I did not feel obliged to defend that concept. Others can do
> >> > > > that more effectively than I.
> >> > > > Adam.
>
> >> > > > On Sep 9, 7:34 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >> > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > I guess Adam may have been a boxer in a past life, a quick jab in
> >> > > > > and
> >> > > > > then back out agian.
>
> >> > > > > On 5 Sep, 05:38, Adam <[email protected]> wrote:- Hide quoted
> >> > text -
>
> >> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> >> --
> >> (
> >> )
> >> I_D Allan- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
