“Clearly that is your individual perception….” – SD
True, and in fact I remain amazed. And, rather than answer your
question directly, I will start at the beginning and address your
original statement. ("...Individual perception does not change
fact..." – SD)
I could ask you a question about it like, what is a ‘fact’? Yet, here
I will posit that any ‘fact’ that you present is based on your
individual perception. Yes, even the one about the sun. Without the
human perception of light, heat, spheres, fire, color, the cosmos
etc., in other words what a sun is as well as how it appears to arise,
cross the heavens and then hide beneath the earth, or, the concept of
the earth rotating allowing the above appearances to occur, there
would be no fact at all. Or, perhaps you would/could produce a fully
objective being who could confirm one of the stories about light? Or
better yet some sort of machine to measure such things, of course said
machine could not be made by a human being nor be interpreted/read by
a human being.
And, yes, I know about some of the ‘rebuttals’ such as “If you don’t
believe in the external world, why don’t you walk through walls?” or
other such strange forms of ‘logic’.
So, your assumption that anything is a ‘fact’ separate from human
thought is the flaw…so any question beyond that such as your last one
is based on an error.
On Sep 15, 6:21 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> Clearly that is your individual perception.
>
> Perhaps you can demonstrate how a "fact" is changed by individual
> perception/subjectivity.
>
> On Sep 15, 8:12 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "...Individual perception does not change fact..." - SD
>
> > I find this an amazing declaration Slip!
>
> > On Sep 15, 3:15 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Haha! Yes Fran, but it is understood that the sun rises up from the
> > > horizon from the human visual perspective, that is why we call it
> > > "sunrise" and later in the day "sunset".
> > > Secondly this is not debating expressions of sunrise or earth rotation
> > > but about fact being distorted by subjectivity.
> > > I can easily make my point using an example other than sunrise.
> > > Individual perception does not change fact. Whatever fact you prefer
> > > to use is your choice.
>
> > > On Sep 15, 2:32 pm, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > On 15 Sep., 21:11, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > The FACT is, Lee, that the sun rises. That IS the fact.
>
> > > > Ah, but is it, Slip? The fact is also that the sun does,not rise but
> > > > rather that the earth turns. At least since Copernicus.
>
> > > > Francis- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
