The person would seep out anyway. :-) On Sep 16, 11:09 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > I speak openly and frankly on this forum without fear of such consequences, > and post with my real name. Anyone concerned about those issues has the > ability to post under a pseudonym, and many do. I think much would be lost in > nuestra cosa if the frankness of our conversation was gone. > > > > [ Attached Message ]From:retiredjim34 <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" > <[email protected]>Date:Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:20:44 -0700 > (PDT)Local:Wed, Sep 16 2009 10:20 amSubject:[Mind's Eye] CAUTION > > In reading some threads recently, I noticed how open and frank some of > the posts were. They talked about scamming the system, legendary > promiscuity, and not quite being the real thing for example. > Given the degree to which electronic gadgets and social sites > have invaded our lives, and the degrees to which some will go when > vetting a job applicant, I suggest that it behoves us all to rein in > our occassional frank and revealing comments. If a prudish HR staff > member happened to come across such comments, they might be shocked, > or worse. And we well might be asked to lead them to such comments by > listing all social sites we patronize. > Just a word of caution. > By the way, does anyone know the post retention policies of Minds > Eye? I fear that it they may keep our posts forever. Jim >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
