the claim is the supreme truth is an amalgamation of (lessor?) truths On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:27 PM, e <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Once again I ask what is your supreme truth? > > > > Truth cannot be encapsulated or propositiponed with words, smelled, > seen, tasted, touched or heard. > > To call it none, one or many is about as meaningful as responding with > your given name to the enquiry "Who am I"? > > Interesting thought because you given name would be a simple expresion of all that goes into the making of of who I am. Often times when confronted with the question "Who are you ?" I have responded "Allan, nothing more , notheing less just Allan," > And yet "it" can be realized. > If it can be realised then there becomes the ability to express it in language or at least attempt to so that others may realize it also, Experience has shown me that those claim to realise "it" and don't even wtry to express it so others can understand (frustrating I know).. well .... Allan > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. > > > -- ( ) I_D Allan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
