Along with why is how? If we can ascertain how we exist then maybe the why becomes clearer or resolves of itself. Changing Descartes a bit too... I think, ‘I exist’, we see that I’s exist within thought bounded contexts. Do I’s exist outside of those thought bounded contexts? I don’t see how we can claim that I’s do. If I’s are then bound to context, then I am is just another thought that arises and passes away with context. That is, I’s really don’t exist the way we think I’s do i.e. permanently and separately. When the I am thought resolves showing there is no separate me, then the infinite totality is realized without an inside or outside.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
