I am gambling that a closer examination of the spiritual realities will also appeal to sceptical reductionists plagued by the (nagging and perhaps secretly welcome) suspicion that there may be more to life than the equations of physics. What I propose may also appeal to those open to the idea of a benevolent deity but put off by the dogmatism of organised religion (Haisch). Not the first time I've seen something like this, or his insistence we are always left 'wondering what came before'. I wonder whether we could get somewhere by avoiding too much complexity through the statements of our beliefs in terms of what we practice, rather than through moribund terms like haecceties.
On 5 Dec, 16:06, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > There's a book by Bernard Haisch that makes some points about the > possibilities of a more rational religious outlook (forgetting the > niceties of haecceties - which is a complete blind Bill - just > wondered if you'd come across it). I've only read the intro - > courtesy of Amazon Kindle. Reminds me of you and Pat and Francis. > There does seem to be some wider interest in our 'collective madness' > for a spirit moved by something 'better informed'. > > On 5 Dec, 15:10, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Haecceities Orn, lets confuse them with haecceities. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
