"schreibewiedusprichstwieduschreipst" is how we start teaching our children how to write. I don't fear them hackerdeities.
On 5 Dez., 17:28, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > I am gambling that a closer examination of the spiritual realities > will also appeal to sceptical reductionists plagued by the (nagging > and perhaps secretly welcome) suspicion that there may be more to life > than the equations of physics. What I propose may also appeal to > those open to the idea of a benevolent deity but put off by the > dogmatism of organised religion (Haisch). Not the first time I've > seen something like this, or his insistence we are always left > 'wondering what came before'. I wonder whether we could get somewhere > by avoiding too much complexity through the statements of our beliefs > in terms of what we practice, rather than through moribund terms like > haecceties. > > On 5 Dec, 16:06, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There's a book by Bernard Haisch that makes some points about the > > possibilities of a more rational religious outlook (forgetting the > > niceties of haecceties - which is a complete blind Bill - just > > wondered if you'd come across it). I've only read the intro - > > courtesy of Amazon Kindle. Reminds me of you and Pat and Francis. > > There does seem to be some wider interest in our 'collective madness' > > for a spirit moved by something 'better informed'. > > > On 5 Dec, 15:10, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Haecceities Orn, lets confuse them with haecceities. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
