Don't confuse 'em with the facts fran!

On Dec 7, 10:20 am, fran the man <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7 Dez., 18:32, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Here it is.
>
>   I want my money back.
>
>
>
> > -Don
>
> Hang on a minute, Don, there's something here I might be getting
> wrong, but I don't think your call is accurate.
>
> (Let me state right at the beginning that, as a non-US citizen, I
> don't intend to go into the rights and wrongs of particular use of
> particular funds. This is an issue of comprehension - my
> comprehension, which may be wrong.)
>
> As I understand it, in August the White House estimated the cost of
> TARP over the next ten years at $341 billion, and the present estimate
> is that TARP will actually cost $200 billion less over the next ten
> years (an average of $14.1 billion anually, rather than $34.1
> billion).
>
> To the best of my knowledge, the US houses of parliament - in common
> with most democracies - vote a budget annually. In the annual budget,
> the government estimates the costs for the public purse for the next
> twelve months and then presents its plan to cover these costs; so much
> should be raised by taxation, so much should be borrowed, so much by
> selling off assets, etc. Parliament then approves (or amends) this.
>
>  So, given the reduced estimated costs of TARP, it is projected that
> the annual deficit caused by TARP over the next ten years will be
> considerably less than was originally estimated. The basic question
> regarding a jobs programme is whether it is desirable to fund this
> over a larger deficit or not - since the budget is not going to be on
> the plus side any time soon.
>
> But ... and this is my basic point ... you can't have your money back,
> because you haven't paid it yet! Whether you pay, and how much you
> pay, is a decision taken every year with the parliamentary approval of
> the annual budget. Projections for the cost of TARP are basically
> planning instruments, used to help put the budget together.
>
> Francis

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.


Reply via email to