Air Head me ..sweet and short ..but I no details are important (chuckle):[ Well let me tell you that just shows me on our Guide to SS is either a great big lie Or they are taking part of it to add somewhere else. Now if they have all this money what in th world are they doing this for..Jobs that is just great, us older people(not real old) have to do without after all those years of work uhmm. Well I tell you what this is really does not make sense and I won't believe it. Run arounds. Ok So give the kids jobs and Lord knows they will need them and good paying ones to support the old ones..This is About as cheesey as it gets. No wonder people are getting on disablity and drawing it now . So they can least get some of there money back. This tax thing is a real illusion of the mind. But people are not so stupid or blind no more. They have been taught can you believe that. Now with all this money and yes it is over few years time span..but what is the deal here? I just know I am going to get angered and turn red on this one...And you know half the people does not get to stop work and draw SS to long anyway I never thought that was right..Wait untill there last few years and they get this and most do not live to draw what they put in. and then they up it to the age of 67 Now I tell you think about it 67 you can draw part of it and wait to die. Bolona...I think age 55 yrs. Would be good and do what you want at your pace and time.
On Dec 8, 5:49 am, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > Ha ha very funny. Actually one of my favorite phrases is "Don't > confuse me with details; just tell me what to do." It was a defense > against wasting time and my Dad's tendency to build a watch instead of > just telling me what damn time it is. I just wanted to get the chores > done so I could get the hell outta the house. > > -Don > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:34 PM, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Don't confuse 'em with the facts fran! > > > On Dec 7, 10:20 am, fran the man <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 7 Dez., 18:32, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Here it is. > > >> I want my money back. > > >> > -Don > > >> Hang on a minute, Don, there's something here I might be getting > >> wrong, but I don't think your call is accurate. > > >> (Let me state right at the beginning that, as a non-US citizen, I > >> don't intend to go into the rights and wrongs of particular use of > >> particular funds. This is an issue of comprehension - my > >> comprehension, which may be wrong.) > > >> As I understand it, in August the White House estimated the cost of > >> TARP over the next ten years at $341 billion, and the present estimate > >> is that TARP will actually cost $200 billion less over the next ten > >> years (an average of $14.1 billion anually, rather than $34.1 > >> billion). > > >> To the best of my knowledge, the US houses of parliament - in common > >> with most democracies - vote a budget annually. In the annual budget, > >> the government estimates the costs for the public purse for the next > >> twelve months and then presents its plan to cover these costs; so much > >> should be raised by taxation, so much should be borrowed, so much by > >> selling off assets, etc. Parliament then approves (or amends) this. > > >> So, given the reduced estimated costs of TARP, it is projected that > >> the annual deficit caused by TARP over the next ten years will be > >> considerably less than was originally estimated. The basic question > >> regarding a jobs programme is whether it is desirable to fund this > >> over a larger deficit or not - since the budget is not going to be on > >> the plus side any time soon. > > >> But ... and this is my basic point ... you can't have your money back, > >> because you haven't paid it yet! Whether you pay, and how much you > >> pay, is a decision taken every year with the parliamentary approval of > >> the annual budget. Projections for the cost of TARP are basically > >> planning instruments, used to help put the budget together. > > >> Francis > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > ""Minds Eye"" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
