On 12 Jan., 20:01, Twirlip <[email protected]> wrote: > But if I admit that I haven't actually read any Kant, it suddenly > doesn't look so good! :-)
Perhaps, but your honest admission not to have read him gets you brownie points anyway ;-) Kant, as it happens, placed a great emphasis on honesty and, in his attempts to practically flesh out the categorical imperative, argued that lying was always immoral. Now that's a point, given - in my view - the inevitable situationalism involved in practical applications of his basic moral pronciple, that one could happily argue about, but if anyone really feels like doing that, I suggest they open another thread ... Francis
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
