Considering that I'm the one that uses the dictionary and you want words to mean whatever the person chooses them to mean whenever they choose them to...do you really want to ask that question?
On Jan 17, 11:25 pm, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > Benefactor ? ! > > Do you know what it means ? > > On Jan 18, 12:21 pm, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > and I just want to say, again, how cute it is that you come screaming > > to the rescue of your benefactor... aaawww...sssoooocute... > > > On Jan 17, 11:10 pm, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Gabby, I'll make an exception and respond to this delicious piece of > > > malice and nastiness from you ! > > > > On Jan 18, 3:39 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > May I kindly ask you to stop sulking and stomping!? > > > > Why ? What is it to you, if Molly sulks or stomps, though I saw no > > > sign of her doing so. She sure seemed defensive, but that seems > > > natural considering the nature of alleged charge one or two people > > > have brought against her. I suppose, everyone defends one's honour. > > > Or, don't you, Gabs ? > > > > > One Vam is enough. > > > > Wow ! How are you certain that just because you are satisfied with > > > one Vam, others would too ? I myself could do with a million more. I > > > also admit, there might be many who'd not tolerate even one - tenth > > > Vam ! > > > > > And if you don't see any reason to argue I would like to refer you to > > > > Ian's posting guidelines which demand the opposite. > > > > Please quote exactly what you are talking about : What does Ian's > > > posting guidelines say ? > > > > > Molly, I wish you all the money in the world if that makes you sleep > > > > better at night. > > > > I'm sure Molly can do without your ( malicious ) wishes, Gabs ! Save > > > the dishonest manners for yourself and yours. > > > > > But for the future, please refrain from any "when I succeeded to let > > > > go, money came to me on miraculous ways" or something like this. > > > > I want more of the same things from Molly, Gabs. It sure shores me > > > up ! You are free not to read them. > > > > > On 17 Jan., 15:40, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > To be perfectly clear, and as I have said many times before, my > > > > > services are not sold from the blog, I have never had a referal or > > > > > book sale directly related to the blog, and from the beginning of my > > > > > participation in ME (2007), although all folks here may not recall, > > > > > some seem to,others don't, I openly asked and individually asked for > > > > > permission to use the comments here. The blog itself is a means to > > > > > explore ideas and engage dialogue on meaningful concepts. I cross > > > > > posts the threads in various groups across the web, a perfectly > > > > > acceptable practice on the internet. Anyone ever expressing > > > > > resistance, including gabbydot, is no longer included on the blog, > > > > > their wishes respected. > > > > > > As there is much contentiousness in this tread about anything posted > > > > > it seems, I will check out now. Thanks to all for your support, I > > > > > don't see any reason to argue. > > > > > > On Jan 17, 8:21 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > No, Allan, I am still disagreeing with you. The opera is not about > > > > > > being right or left but about me myself and I. Yet the great honour > > > > > > that you feel attracted to is directly linked to the ME ME ME. > > > > > > > You're right, Molly never directly wronged any ME member. Just like > > > > > > it's not wrong to sell your sweets with a big fat sticker saying "0% > > > > > > fat!". I didn't know what she was doing until her practice became a > > > > > > public issue here. Only then I realized that she published articles > > > > > > here to gather selected content that she would publish under her own > > > > > > blog name. The image that the blog creates, is of course of monetary > > > > > > value when it comes to selling her own services. > > > > > > > I have learned to become more care careful about the context in > > > > > > which > > > > > > I set my data. You will find a blank space behind my educational > > > > > > background on facebook, for example. MEEEEEEEEEEEEEE :-) > > > > > > > On 17 Jan., 12:36, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > SD > > > > > > > Molly has never wronged any member of ME to my knowledge. ME is > > > > > > > about > > > > > > > sharing ideas and concepts (I know some members don't think so) > > > > > > > ,, and if > > > > > > > you put it up in the group well all I can say is good luck in > > > > > > > court. I have > > > > > > > read you violating the copyright of others.. > > > > > > > > Personally if some one expands on some of my thoughts it is a > > > > > > > great honour > > > > > > > to have contributed to society. I think there is far to much of > > > > > > > the great > > > > > > > right wing republican opera being sung... (Spraying throat > > > > > > > preparing to > > > > > > > sing..) me, me, me, ME, ME, MEEEEEEEEEEEEEE. > > > > > > > Allan > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I wouldn't know but found articlestree.com on the wiki site and > > > > > > > > went > > > > > > > > there to discover the YouTube issue. > > > > > > > > > I think internet piracy and infringement is going to take place > > > > > > > > because we are in International waters where anything goes and > > > > > > > > establishing liability, initiating prosecution procedures that > > > > > > > > culminate to a satisfactory end are highly unlikely. Its not > > > > > > > > much > > > > > > > > different from the phishing scams originating out of foreign > > > > > > > > countries. What are we to do about someone in Nigeria pirating > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > work, zilch! > > > > > > > > > On Jan 16, 8:59 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > The above citation was (as referenced parenthetically) from > > > > > > > > > the last > > > > > > > > > thread on the subject, and the words were gruff's, not mine, > > > > > > > > > and I am > > > > > > > > > not sure where he got the legal sitings. > > > > > > > > > > I do not use any comments when a participant has requested > > > > > > > > > that I do > > > > > > > > > not. > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 16, 8:34 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > The unauthorized use of text content can be a form of > > > > > > > > > > copyright > > > > > > > > > > infringement. It is common on the world wide web for text > > > > > > > > > > to be copied > > > > > > > > > > from one site to another without consent of the author. > > > > > > > > > > Roberta Beach > > > > > > > > > > Jacobson criticizes the misappropriation of writers' work > > > > > > > > > > by websites > > > > > > > > > > in her article Copyrights and Wrongs. This article was > > > > > > > > > > added to > > > > > > > > > > articlestree.com[8] on November 27, 2001; ironically, it > > > > > > > > > > has since > > > > > > > > > > been copied to hundreds of websites,[9] many of them > > > > > > > > > > claiming > > > > > > > > > > copyright over the work or charging money to access it. > > > > > > > > > > > 8 ^ Jacobson, Roberta Beach (2001-11-27). "Copyrights and > > > > > > > > > > Wrongs". > > > > > > > >www.articlestree.com.http://www.articlestree.com/copywriting/copyrigh..... > > > > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > Retrieved 2007-04-07. > > > > > > > > > > 9 ^ "Results 1 - 10 of about 371 for "Roberta Beach > > > > > > > > > > Jacobson" > > > > > > > > > > "Copyrights and Wrongs"".www.google.com. > > > > > > > >http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Roberta+Beach+Jacobs....... > > > > > > > > > > Retrieved 2007-04-07. > > > > > > > > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement#Text > > > > > > > > > > > It wasn't an intention to establish lawsuit but merely a > > > > > > > > > > cease and > > > > > > > > > > desist declaration. "Potentially" a compilation of copied > > > > > > > > > > texts can > > > > > > > > > > form a published work with all copyright reservations > > > > > > > > > > thereby > > > > > > > > > > rendering it as having monetary value. You could easily > > > > > > > > > > compile (not > > > > > > > > > > implying intent) the copied ME posts and put together any > > > > > > > > > > form of > > > > > > > > > > marketable material. Establishing reserved rights to my > > > > > > > > > > personal work > > > > > > > > > > gives me the opportunity to compile my own work for > > > > > > > > > > integration within > > > > > > > > > > another body of material, therefore the work does have > > > > > > > > > > monetary value > > > > > > > > > > when considering authorship aside from the what you have > > > > > > > > > > labeled as a > > > > > > > > > > diminutive value of personal ego. The laws are complex and > > > > > > > > > > subject to > > > > > > > > > > a myriad of interpretations adding to the difficulty of > > > > > > > > > > establishing > > > > > > > > > > laws concerning electronic information and the copying and > > > > > > > > > > exchange of > > > > > > > > > > such information. Who would buy books if they were just so > > > > > > > > > > easy to > > > > > > > > > > copy from some Internet site? This is the crux of the > > > > > > > > > > matter. > > > > > > > > > > > Consider YouTube's use of and distribution of material and > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > implications. (scroll down for the article) > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.articlestree.com/Legal/youtube-could-be-liable-for-copyrig. > > > > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > > Again it is simply a cease and desist declaration not a > > > > > > > > > > prelude to > > > > > > > > > > legal remedies for infringement nor is it a complaint as > > > > > > > > > > perceived by > > > > > > > > > > Twirlip in the post above. I think you understand that. > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 16, 6:54 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > To be completely accurate, I began at Minds Eye asking > > > > > > > > > > > individuals > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > permission, was told by the Mods that was not necessary > > > > > > > > > > > because the > > > > > > > > > > > posts here were public domain, so stopped. Sometime > > > > > > > > > > > later, the > > > > > > > > public > > > > > > > > > > > domain issue was challenged, and copyright/fair use laws > > > > > > > > > > > concerning > > > > > > > > > > > cross posting and copying the Minds Eye posts were > > > > > > > > > > > discussed again. > > > > > > > > > > > Truth is, there are many sites that pull these > > > > > > > > > > > discussions with an > > > > > > > > rss > > > > > > > > > > > feed and are used only for advertising. My blog is > > > > > > > > > > > different than > > > > > > > > > > > that, I make no money from it, and use it to create > > > > > > > > > > > discussion and > > > > > > > > > > > develop ideas. I change fictitious names to real names > > > > > > > > > > > when I know > > > > > > > > > > > them with permission and in respect because I think we > > > > > > > > > > > are all adults > > > > > > > > > > > with adult names in the discussions. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Twirlip, for your permission. > > > > > > > > > > > > Applicable fair > > ... > > read more »
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
