On Jan 20, 1:43 pm, I wrote: > I'm sure this can be said in a simpler and less absurd fashion.
Perhaps this helps: there is more than one kind of belief. I haven't yet done the reading of Sartre that I keep meaning to get around to, but perhaps I can anticipate, and call one kind of belief "bad faith". It is from the viewpoint of bad faith that all belief in oneself or in God is absurd. But from the viewpoint of a free, conscious, rational and ethical being, such belief is not absurd. And one should always choose not to have bad faith, but to be free, rational, conscious, and ethical. However, one is never completely free of bad faith, because it is the body, in the form of mind. So, one is never free of the sense of the absurd. Or, as Rush put it: http://lyrics.ivory.org/freewill.html You can choose a ready guide in some celestial voice. If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice. You can choose from phantom fears and kindness that can kill I will choose a path that's clear I will choose free will. (There is a whole lot more I should have said, in order to forestall some quite reasonable and foreseeable misunderstandings, but I don't want to poison this thread too much, as I have already done once. At some point, I will have to distinguish 'God' from the 'demiurge', and having done that, I will then have to distinguish what I believe, or what I am slowly coming to believe, from Gnostic asceticism and denial of the body. There is something also about fear of death, and resignation, both being preferable to anger, which in "Star Wars" terms only gives power to the "Dark Side". Etc., etc., yadda yadda! All in good time, no doubt, if I don't get kicked out of here!)
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
