Myths/religions/rulerships exist to bind and direct a society and
create a common purpose and understanding/expectation- even at the
nuclear family level. They are helpful in conquests if the conquered
are to be integrated. It really doesn't matter if these systems
contain a good deal of nonsense as common/simple people do not analyse
in a rational way and are content to survive- literally- by accepting
the norm. Rational/scientific challenges usually are seen as a threat.
Also beyond the control of authority is the unconscious of the
individual which include dreams and imagination. Populations are
generally cogs in a giant machine used by an elite group as a source
of wealth/taxes and production/labor. The elite provide sytems/
entertainments to distract- eating up free time that might question or
rebel.

On Jan 27, 10:23 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well I'll not argue what you said and what you did not.
>
> It is a good point you make though about divinity and proof or lack
> of. Agian though not one that I readily agree with.
>
> If we use morality as an example of this 'social truth' you speak of,
> we can see that morality changes form time to time, and place to
> place. Is this because morality does not exists or os ot because our
> understanding of what is a good and a bad action changes?
>
> I think we will both agree to the later.  So it is with spirtuality.
> Our understanding of wha
>
> On 27 Jan, 15:40, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I never said they didn't challenge or change, but replacing one
> > religion or dogma with another counts as much as swapping one rotten
> > fruit for another. That point though, is yet more proof of the lack of
> > divinity involved. The more people learn, the less the old dogma works
> > because there is only social truth involved. If a god had inspired
> > religions, the texts would stand for all time and be interpreted the
> > same way. or else god changes, which means he feels that he used to be
> > less right, which means he is not divine...
>
> > On Jan 27, 5:14 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Sorry Fidds ol buddy ol pal, but you are quite wrong you know.
>
> > > A quick scan of the history of just one religion, lets just choose
> > > Christianity as you seem to dislike it the most, shows that indeed
> > > dogma has been chalenged over the years, and quiet frequently too.
> > > New religions spring up as a result of people examining dogma and
> > > finding it wanting. Like ANY sphere of knowledge 'spirtual' knowledge
> > > grows, changes and adapts as people learn more, to claim the opposite
> > > is at worst a lie and at best shows ignorance of the subject.
>
> > > As to the rest of your rot, I must say that I dispise this
> > > generalistic asurtion the relgiougous are so because of a lack of
> > > critical thought.  That too is quite wrong.
>
> > > On 25 Jan, 14:44, islah05 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > to blame religion for stifling rationalization is totally untrue and
> > > > ignorance. Islam is the addeen of honouring the importance of
> > > > reasoning and yet warning its limitation and short coming. The mission
> > > > of intelect and reasoning is to explore the explicit meaning of the
> > > > revelation and at the same time subdue to the its limitation.
>
> > > > On Jan 25, 1:11 pm, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Very simply: if one didn't believe or profess belief in the current
> > > > > cult, one died and therefore didn't effectively pass their genes on.
> > > > > After billions killed in the name of islam, xtianity, and other cults,
> > > > > is it really a wonder that so many believe without question? Genes
> > > > > that promoted critical thinking were removed from the pool by violence
> > > > > and murder.
> > > > > I wonder why so many disbelieve. Is it because the natural tendency of
> > > > > humanity is to think and since so many religions that murder thinkers
> > > > > are no longer allowed to kill them? Yes.
> > > > > Well into the 20th century, theists like hitler (christian), the kkk
> > > > > (christian), zionists (jewish, christian), "palestinians (muslim),"
> > > > > pat robertsons and ilk( christian), witch hunters in africa that burn,
> > > > > torture, and murder children for increased fame(christian, muslim),
> > > > > etc., have killed or are killing non-believers. Unsurprisingly,
> > > > > unbelievers are rare where they may come in contact with these groups.
> > > > > Fortunately, compared with the last 2k years, these murders are
> > > > > isolated, focused, and rare. They will not affect the overall human
> > > > > gene pool the way that religion has for so long.
>
> > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYetSghlLA0
>
> > > > > If people had been allowed to think and challenge dogma, the European
> > > > > dark ages wouldn't have happened. For proof, look to the arabs. They
> > > > > began as a movement that enjoyed and promoted thought and reason. They
> > > > > only fell into the current sad state because of close-minded
> > > > > fundamentalists that effectively erased the gains that occurred during
> > > > > their ascendancy. Al-Ghazali began as a person that loved intelligence
> > > > > and yet he started the islamic movement demanding that all things
> > > > > philosophical prove the existence of god or be banned. A sad case of
> > > > > religious corruption causing an intelligent mind to rot.
>
> > > > > For those that wish to ask why this is true, please learn what a
> > > > > textbook is. Water is wet, everything living needs food, and we are
> > > > > apes. These are all true as is the fact that religion requires
> > > > > obedience.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to